BLCN vs. SOLT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BLCN (Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF) and SOLT (2x Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLCN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren NASDAQ Blockchain Economy Index, while SOLT is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. BLCN is passively managed, while SOLT is actively managed. Over the past year, BLCN returned 5.44% vs -90.39% for SOLT. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BLCN charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.85%/yr for SOLT.

Performance

BLCN vs. SOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) and 2x Solana ETF (SOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCN achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly higher than SOLT's -74.81% return.

BLCN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• 6M: 2.03%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 1Y: 5.44%
• 3Y*: 2.06%
• 5Y*: -10.83%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.13%

SOLT

• 1D: 2.98%
• 1M: -17.52%
• 6M: -61.87%
• YTD: -74.81%
• 1Y: -90.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -79.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SOLT 2x Solana ETF	$8.77M	$11.20M	$16.38M

BLCN vs. SOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF	1.35%	18.83%
SOLT 2x Solana ETF	-74.81%	-55.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCN and SOLT is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

BLCN vs. SOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BLCN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SOLT

SOLT Risk / Return Rank: 3
SOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
SOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
SOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BLCN vs. SOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) and 2x Solana ETF (SOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLCN	SOLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	-0.62	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.30	-1.22	+1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.87	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	-0.94	+0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.05	-1.17	+1.22

BLCN vs. SOLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCN Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the SOLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCN and SOLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLCN vs. SOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCN drawdown since its inception was -67.51%, smaller than the maximum SOLT drawdown of -96.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCN and SOLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLCN	SOLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.51%	-96.28%	+28.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.53%	-96.28%	+66.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.81%	-95.24%	+44.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.52%	-58.18%	+27.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.43%	77.22%	-62.79%

Volatility

BLCN vs. SOLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF (BLCN) is 9.60%, while 2x Solana ETF (SOLT) has a volatility of 21.51%. This indicates that BLCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLCN	SOLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.60%	21.51%	-11.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.35%	101.70%	-73.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.43%	145.31%	-107.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.38%	148.72%	-113.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.34%	148.72%	-117.38%

BLCN vs. SOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCN has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SOLT's 1.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLCN vs. SOLT - Dividend Comparison

BLCN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLCN Siren ETF Trust Siren Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF	2.85%	3.01%	0.67%	0.54%	1.28%	0.56%	0.58%	1.45%	1.16%
SOLT 2x Solana ETF	5.65%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLCN and SOLT in my portfolio?

BLCN and SOLT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLCN or SOLT?

SOLT has higher volatility (21.51%) compared to BLCN (9.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLCN dropped -67.51% vs SOLT's -96.28%.

Which ETF is better, BLCN or SOLT?

On 1-year performance, BLCN leads with 5.44% vs -90.39% for SOLT. On fees, BLCN is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BLCN has been the lower-risk option at 9.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLCN or SOLT?

Over the 1-year period, BLCN has performed better with a 5.44% return vs -90.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLCN or SOLT?

BLCN is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.85% for SOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLCN or SOLT?

SOLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 2.85% for BLCN.

What is the main difference between BLCN and SOLT?

BLCN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SOLT is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BLCN and 1.85% for SOLT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.