SOLT vs. DECO
SOLT (2x Solana ETF) and DECO (State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) are both Blockchain funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SOLT returned -90.96% vs 167.73% for DECO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOLT charges 1.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DECO.
Performance
SOLT vs. DECO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOLT achieves a -74.43% return, which is significantly lower than DECO's 79.56% return.
SOLT
- 1D
- -9.55%
- 1M
- -30.13%
- YTD
- -74.43%
- 6M
- -81.02%
- 1Y
- -90.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DECO
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 39.50%
- YTD
- 79.56%
- 6M
- 62.77%
- 1Y
- 167.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOLT vs. DECO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SOLT 2x Solana ETF | -74.43% | -53.74% |
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 79.56% | 68.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOLT and DECO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SOLT and DECO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOLT vs. DECO — Risk / Return Rank
SOLT
DECO
SOLT vs. DECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Solana ETF (SOLT) and State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOLT | DECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.49 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 6.59 | -7.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 18.43 | -19.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOLT | DECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 3.80 | -4.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.55 | 1.96 | -2.51 |
Drawdowns
SOLT vs. DECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOLT drawdown since its inception was -95.17%, which is greater than DECO's maximum drawdown of -47.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOLT and DECO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOLT | DECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.17% | -47.71% | -47.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.17% | -25.60% | -69.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.17% | -0.33% | -94.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.33% | -11.67% | -41.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.62% | 9.14% | +58.48% |
Volatility
SOLT vs. DECO - Volatility Comparison
2x Solana ETF (SOLT) has a higher volatility of 32.36% compared to State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) at 11.53%. This indicates that SOLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOLT | DECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.36% | 11.53% | +20.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 102.45% | 33.83% | +68.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.88% | 44.46% | +102.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 150.90% | 51.50% | +99.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 150.90% | 51.50% | +99.40% |
SOLT vs. DECO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOLT has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DECO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOLT vs. DECO - Dividend Comparison
SOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, more than DECO's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 0.64% | 1.16% | 1.73% |
SOLT 2x Solana ETF | 5.98% | 1.22% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOLT and DECO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOLT has higher volatility (32.36%) compared to DECO (11.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOLT dropped -95.17% vs DECO's -47.71%.
On 1-year performance, DECO leads with 167.73% vs -90.96% for SOLT. On fees, DECO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DECO has been the lower-risk option at 11.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DECO has performed better with a 167.73% return vs -90.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DECO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.85% for SOLT.
SOLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.98%, compared with 0.64% for DECO.
They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.85% for SOLT and 0.65% for DECO.
DECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOLT and DECO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer