PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKTSX vs. MEQFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKTSX vs. MEQFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) and AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKTSX achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly higher than MEQFX's -4.74% return. Over the past 10 years, BKTSX has outperformed MEQFX with an annualized return of 15.31%, while MEQFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.84% annualized return.


BKTSX

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.47%
YTD
10.08%
6M
8.96%
1Y
25.53%
3Y*
21.13%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
15.31%

MEQFX

1D
-1.11%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
-4.74%
6M
-5.74%
1Y
-9.31%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKTSX vs. MEQFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
10.08%17.15%23.83%26.02%-19.05%25.56%20.82%31.12%-5.37%21.02%
MEQFX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund
-4.74%-2.58%24.99%19.53%-9.50%43.58%-4.00%16.01%8.16%15.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BKTSX and MEQFX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.80

The correlation between BKTSX and MEQFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKTSX vs. MEQFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKTSX
BKTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BKTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BKTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

MEQFX
MEQFX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MEQFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEQFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEQFX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MEQFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEQFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKTSX vs. MEQFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) and AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKTSXMEQFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.91

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

-0.50

+3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.51

-0.93

+14.44

BKTSX vs. MEQFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKTSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the MEQFX Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKTSX and MEQFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKTSX vs. MEQFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKTSX drawdown since its inception was -34.97%, smaller than the maximum MEQFX drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKTSX and MEQFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKTSXMEQFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.97%

-55.38%

+20.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-17.43%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-17.43%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.98%

-19.48%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.97%

-28.69%

-6.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-15.95%

+14.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-12.19%

+7.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

9.44%

-7.46%

Volatility

BKTSX vs. MEQFX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX) at 3.77%. This indicates that BKTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEQFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKTSXMEQFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

3.77%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

14.99%

-5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

17.05%

-4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

17.52%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

19.62%

-1.16%

BKTSX vs. MEQFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKTSX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than MEQFX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKTSX vs. MEQFX - Dividend Comparison

BKTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while MEQFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
1.06%1.14%1.27%1.46%1.64%1.58%1.51%2.15%2.49%2.17%1.54%0.00%
MEQFX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund
0.00%0.00%4.48%0.98%2.13%27.90%0.00%9.17%3.40%30.28%5.96%11.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKTSX and MEQFX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKTSX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to MEQFX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKTSX dropped -34.97% vs MEQFX's -55.38%.

BKTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKTSX and MEQFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer