PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEQFX vs. YASLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEQFX vs. YASLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEQFX achieves a -3.67% return, which is significantly lower than YASLX's 14.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MEQFX having a 10.81% annualized return and YASLX not far ahead at 11.05%.


MEQFX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.69%
YTD
-3.67%
6M
-5.02%
1Y
-7.66%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.81%

YASLX

1D
-0.64%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
14.01%
6M
14.96%
1Y
14.11%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEQFX vs. YASLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEQFX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund
-3.67%-2.58%24.99%19.53%-9.50%43.58%-4.00%16.01%8.16%15.35%
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
14.01%6.27%11.23%3.65%-13.59%24.45%12.82%17.07%-10.15%34.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MEQFX and YASLX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.53

The correlation between MEQFX and YASLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEQFX vs. YASLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEQFX
MEQFX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MEQFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEQFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEQFX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MEQFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEQFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

YASLX
YASLX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
YASLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YASLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
YASLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
YASLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
YASLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEQFX vs. YASLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEQFXYASLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.22

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

1.32

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.83

3.77

-4.60

MEQFX vs. YASLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEQFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the YASLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEQFX and YASLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEQFX vs. YASLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEQFX drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than YASLX's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEQFX and YASLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEQFXYASLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-38.91%

-16.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.43%

-10.18%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.43%

-16.65%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.48%

-27.74%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.69%

-38.91%

+10.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.00%

-3.21%

-11.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.19%

-8.19%

-4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.39%

3.55%

+5.84%

Volatility

MEQFX vs. YASLX - Volatility Comparison

AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund (MEQFX) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX) at 3.17%. This indicates that MEQFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YASLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEQFXYASLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.17%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.97%

8.75%

+6.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.98%

11.18%

+5.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

16.33%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

15.03%

+4.58%

MEQFX vs. YASLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEQFX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than YASLX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEQFX vs. YASLX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEQFX nor YASLX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEQFX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select Fund
0.00%0.00%4.48%0.98%2.13%27.90%0.00%9.17%3.40%30.28%5.96%11.63%
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%15.82%8.97%0.94%3.85%2.62%12.95%9.89%4.86%3.28%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEQFX and YASLX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEQFX has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to YASLX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEQFX dropped -55.38% vs YASLX's -38.91%.

YASLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEQFX and YASLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer