PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKTSX vs. BTMKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKTSX vs. BTMKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) and iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKTSX achieves a 11.47% return, which is significantly higher than BTMKX's 9.29% return. Over the past 10 years, BKTSX has outperformed BTMKX with an annualized return of 15.11%, while BTMKX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.38% annualized return.


BKTSX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.02%
YTD
11.47%
6M
11.82%
1Y
29.23%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
12.97%
10Y*
15.11%

BTMKX

1D
-0.28%
1M
2.62%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.25%
1Y
21.09%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKTSX vs. BTMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
11.47%17.15%23.83%26.02%-19.05%25.56%20.82%31.12%-5.37%21.02%
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
9.29%31.70%3.70%18.37%-14.04%11.30%8.07%21.96%-13.38%25.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BKTSX and BTMKX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.78

The correlation between BKTSX and BTMKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKTSX vs. BTMKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKTSX
BKTSX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BKTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BKTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

BTMKX
BTMKX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BTMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKTSX vs. BTMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) and iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKTSXBTMKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

1.49

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.35

2.13

+1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.27

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

2.01

+1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.42

7.54

+7.88

BKTSX vs. BTMKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKTSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the BTMKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKTSX and BTMKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKTSXBTMKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.49

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.54

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.56

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.39

+0.43

Drawdowns

BKTSX vs. BTMKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKTSX drawdown since its inception was -34.97%, roughly equal to the maximum BTMKX drawdown of -33.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKTSX and BTMKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKTSXBTMKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.97%

-33.92%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-11.30%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-13.66%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.98%

-29.23%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.97%

-33.92%

-1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-7.77%

+3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.01%

-1.08%

Volatility

BKTSX vs. BTMKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) is 2.94%, while iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that BKTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTMKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKTSXBTMKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

4.73%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

12.29%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

15.17%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

16.17%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

16.67%

+1.74%

BKTSX vs. BTMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKTSX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than BTMKX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKTSX vs. BTMKX - Dividend Comparison

BKTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than BTMKX's 3.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
1.04%1.14%1.27%1.46%1.64%1.58%1.51%2.15%2.49%2.17%1.54%0.00%
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
3.43%3.74%3.43%3.19%2.80%3.06%1.99%3.34%4.58%2.45%2.85%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKTSX and BTMKX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTMKX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to BKTSX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKTSX dropped -34.97% vs BTMKX's -33.92%.

BKTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKTSX and BTMKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer