PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTMKX vs. VTSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTMKX vs. VTSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares (VTSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BTMKX having a 12.75% return and VTSNX slightly higher at 12.79%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BTMKX having a 9.67% annualized return and VTSNX not far behind at 9.42%.


BTMKX

1D
2.73%
1M
2.01%
6M
7.32%
YTD
12.75%
1Y
26.32%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
9.68%
10Y*
9.67%
ALL TIME*
6.84%

VTSNX

1D
2.75%
1M
0.11%
6M
6.67%
YTD
12.79%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
16.82%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
9.42%
ALL TIME*
6.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BTMKX vs. VTSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
12.75%31.70%3.70%18.37%-14.04%11.30%8.07%21.96%-13.38%25.17%
VTSNX
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares
12.79%32.24%5.38%15.29%-15.99%8.64%11.27%21.69%-14.41%27.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BTMKX and VTSNX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011

0.97

The correlation between BTMKX and VTSNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTMKX vs. VTSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTMKX
BTMKX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BTMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VTSNX
VTSNX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VTSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTMKX vs. VTSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares (VTSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTMKXVTSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.31

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.33

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.38

8.66

-0.28

BTMKX vs. VTSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the VTSNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTMKX and VTSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTMKX vs. VTSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTMKX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, smaller than the maximum VTSNX drawdown of -35.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTMKX and VTSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTMKXVTSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.92%

-35.72%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-11.29%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.66%

-13.14%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

-29.50%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-35.72%

+1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.62%

+2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.70%

-8.04%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.03%

-0.05%

Volatility

BTMKX vs. VTSNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) is 4.73%, while Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares (VTSNX) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that BTMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTMKXVTSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

5.43%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

14.12%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.84%

15.98%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

15.36%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

15.83%

+0.58%

BTMKX vs. VTSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTMKX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VTSNX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BTMKX vs. VTSNX - Dividend Comparison

BTMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than VTSNX's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
3.32%3.74%3.43%3.19%2.80%3.06%1.99%3.34%4.58%2.45%2.85%2.42%
VTSNX
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares
2.58%3.17%3.36%3.24%3.08%3.08%2.13%3.16%3.19%2.75%2.95%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BTMKX and VTSNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTSNX has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to BTMKX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTMKX dropped -33.92% vs VTSNX's -35.72%.

VTSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTMKX and VTSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer