PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKT vs. BILS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKT vs. BILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKT vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKT
BlackRock Income Trust
-1.93%5.92%3.33%7.69%-21.51%-0.44%1.95%
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
0.80%4.23%5.17%4.92%0.90%-0.08%0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKT achieves a -1.93% return, which is significantly lower than BILS's 0.80% return.


BKT

1D
0.86%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
-1.93%
6M
-1.35%
1Y
-1.29%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
-2.33%
10Y*
1.07%

BILS

1D
0.02%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.82%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKT vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKT has a 2.06% expense ratio, which is higher than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BKT vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKT
BKT Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKT Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BILS
BILS Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILS Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILS Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKT vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKTBILSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.16

16.39

-16.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.17

75.13

-75.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

26.69

-25.72

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

132.67

-132.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.23

1,118.82

-1,119.05

BKT vs. BILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKT Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the BILS Sharpe Ratio of 16.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKT and BILS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKTBILSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

16.39

-16.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

10.37

-10.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

9.65

-9.52

Correlation

The correlation between BKT and BILS is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BKT vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison

BKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%, more than BILS's 3.96% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKT
BlackRock Income Trust
9.97%9.53%9.19%8.69%8.35%7.31%6.80%6.82%6.48%5.15%5.09%5.89%
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
3.96%4.08%5.01%4.98%1.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BKT vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKT drawdown since its inception was -48.86%, which is greater than BILS's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKT and BILS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKTBILSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.86%

-0.41%

-48.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.89%

-0.03%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.70%

-0.40%

-35.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.16%

0.00%

-19.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.74%

-0.04%

-14.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

0.00%

+2.70%

Volatility

BKT vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) has a higher volatility of 2.55% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) at 0.05%. This indicates that BKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKTBILSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

0.05%

+2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.60%

0.15%

+4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.91%

0.24%

+7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.25%

0.31%

+10.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.70%

0.30%

+9.40%