PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKSE vs. IJT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKSE vs. IJT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKSE achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly lower than IJT's 15.36% return.


BKSE

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.60%
YTD
13.03%
6M
12.11%
1Y
32.65%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*

IJT

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.97%
YTD
15.36%
6M
13.60%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKSE vs. IJT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
13.03%13.09%9.56%22.37%-18.44%16.18%55.56%
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
15.36%5.26%9.33%17.11%-21.32%22.37%54.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BKSE and IJT is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020

0.96

The correlation between BKSE and IJT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKSE vs. IJT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKSE
IJT

Technology

16.8%
20.1%

Financial Services

16.4%
13.6%

Industrials

15.4%
20.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
9.8%

Healthcare

11.4%
14.5%

Energy

7.0%
4.9%

Real Estate

6.6%
6.3%

Basic Materials

4.5%
2.8%

Utilities

3.4%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
2.8%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.7%

Technology

BKSE
16.8%
IJT
20.1%

Financial Services

BKSE
16.4%
IJT
13.6%

Industrials

BKSE
15.4%
IJT
20.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BKSE
13.3%
IJT
9.8%

Healthcare

BKSE
11.4%
IJT
14.5%

Energy

BKSE
7.0%
IJT
4.9%

Real Estate

BKSE
6.6%
IJT
6.3%

Basic Materials

BKSE
4.5%
IJT
2.8%

Utilities

BKSE
3.4%
IJT
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

BKSE
3.2%
IJT
2.8%

Communication Services

BKSE
2.2%
IJT
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKSE vs. IJT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKSE
BKSE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BKSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKSE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BKSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IJT
IJT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJT Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKSE vs. IJT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKSEIJTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

2.90

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.15

10.06

+2.10

BKSE vs. IJT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the IJT Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKSE and IJT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKSEIJTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.50

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.25

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.39

+0.34

Drawdowns

BKSE vs. IJT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKSE drawdown since its inception was -29.08%, smaller than the maximum IJT drawdown of -57.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKSE and IJT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKSEIJTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.08%

-57.61%

+28.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-9.08%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.76%

-27.41%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.08%

-29.24%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-1.48%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.06%

-10.31%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.61%

+0.08%

Volatility

BKSE vs. IJT - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) have volatilities of 4.47% and 4.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKSEIJTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

4.61%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

12.47%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.63%

17.56%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.43%

21.50%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

23.02%

-0.72%

BKSE vs. IJT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKSE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IJT's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKSE vs. IJT - Dividend Comparison

BKSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than IJT's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
1.16%1.26%1.55%1.38%1.50%1.17%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJT
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF
0.77%0.91%1.06%1.02%1.08%0.63%0.68%0.92%0.92%0.86%1.03%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, BKSE and IJT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IJT has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to BKSE (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKSE dropped -29.08% vs IJT's -57.61%.

On 5-year performance, BKSE leads with 6.89% vs 5.43% for IJT. On fees, BKSE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKSE has performed better with a 6.89% return vs 5.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKSE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJT.

BKSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.77% for IJT.

BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index, while IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKSE and 0.18% for IJT.

BKSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKSE and IJT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer