BKR vs. EQH
BKR (Baker Hughes Company) and EQH (Equitable Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. BKR operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while EQH operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, BKR returned 22.39%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for EQH. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BKR vs. EQH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKR achieves a 39.64% return, which is significantly higher than EQH's -6.30% return.
BKR
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 39.64%
- 6M
- 35.70%
- 1Y
- 64.52%
- 3Y*
- 30.72%
- 5Y*
- 22.39%
- 10Y*
- —
EQH
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 6M
- -7.48%
- 1Y
- -12.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- —
BKR vs. EQH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKR Baker Hughes Company | 39.64% | 13.39% | 23.11% | 18.58% | 25.96% | 19.03% | -15.15% | 23.01% | -39.81% |
EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc. | -6.30% | 3.17% | 45.04% | 19.63% | -10.17% | 31.00% | 6.52% | 53.13% | -14.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKR and EQH is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BKR and EQH has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
BKR:
$3.14
EQH:
-$3.67
BKR:
2.25
EQH:
0.87
BKR:
$27.89B
EQH:
$11.32B
BKR:
$6.57B
EQH:
$6.96B
BKR:
$4.20B
EQH:
-$759.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKR vs. EQH — Risk / Return Rank
BKR
EQH
BKR vs. EQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baker Hughes Company (BKR) and Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKR | EQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.94 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | -0.42 | +4.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.78 | -0.82 | +12.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKR vs. EQH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKR drawdown since its inception was -75.38%, which is greater than EQH's maximum drawdown of -61.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKR and EQH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKR | EQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.38% | -61.33% | -14.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.86% | -35.85% | +18.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.00% | -35.85% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.53% | -35.85% | -10.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.07% | -19.51% | +10.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.66% | -12.12% | -12.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.64% | 18.23% | -12.59% |
Volatility
BKR vs. EQH - Volatility Comparison
Baker Hughes Company (BKR) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) at 9.41%. This indicates that BKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKR | EQH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.29% | 9.41% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.84% | 25.38% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.14% | 31.86% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.09% | 33.05% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.20% | 38.75% | +1.45% |
Dividends
BKR vs. EQH - Dividend Comparison
BKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than EQH's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKR Baker Hughes Company | 1.46% | 2.02% | 2.05% | 2.28% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 3.45% | 2.81% | 3.35% | 56.42% |
EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc. | 2.52% | 2.20% | 1.99% | 2.58% | 2.72% | 2.17% | 2.58% | 2.34% | 1.56% | 0.00% |
Financials
BKR vs. EQH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baker Hughes Company and Equitable Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BKR vs. EQH - Profitability Comparison
BKR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baker Hughes Company reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 6.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.
EQH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equitable Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.61B and revenue of 4.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.2%.
BKR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baker Hughes Company reported an operating income of 809.00M and revenue of 6.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.
EQH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equitable Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
BKR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baker Hughes Company reported a net income of 930.00M and revenue of 6.59B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
EQH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equitable Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 621.00M and revenue of 4.23B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BKR and EQH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKR has higher volatility (11.29%) compared to EQH (9.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKR dropped -75.38% vs EQH's -61.33%.
BKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKR and EQH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer