BKPIX vs. UGPIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BKPIX (ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund) and UGPIX (ProFunds UltraChina) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, BKPIX returned 9.99%/yr vs -13.12%/yr for UGPIX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKPIX charges 1.71%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for UGPIX.

Performance

BKPIX vs. UGPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund (BKPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKPIX achieves a 5.26% return, which is significantly higher than UGPIX's -25.02% return. Over the past 10 years, BKPIX has outperformed UGPIX with an annualized return of 9.99%, while UGPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -13.12% annualized return.

BKPIX

• 1D: 2.37%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 5.26%
• 6M: 6.99%
• 1Y: 26.50%
• 3Y*: 28.51%
• 5Y*: 1.93%
• 10Y*: 9.99%

UGPIX

• 1D: 4.53%
• 1M: -6.19%
• YTD: -25.02%
• 6M: -28.64%
• 1Y: -11.24%
• 3Y*: -5.13%
• 5Y*: -34.94%
• 10Y*: -13.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKPIX vs. UGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKPIX ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund	5.26%	11.57%	28.64%	9.95%	-30.83%	52.43%	-30.69%	55.99%	-27.23%	26.77%
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina	-25.02%	36.28%	-21.79%	-11.49%	-53.03%	-73.86%	76.47%	40.07%	-46.51%	105.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BKPIX and UGPIX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2001	0.21

The correlation between BKPIX and UGPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BKPIX vs. UGPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKPIX

BKPIX Risk / Return Rank: 13
BKPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BKPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
BKPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
BKPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
BKPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

UGPIX

UGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
UGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
UGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
UGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
UGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
UGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKPIX vs. UGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund (BKPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKPIX	UGPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	-0.19	+1.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	0.09	+1.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.01	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	-0.19	+1.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.41	-0.34	+3.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKPIX vs. UGPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the UGPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKPIX and UGPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKPIX	UGPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	-0.19	+1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	-0.09	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	-0.05	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	-0.05	+0.11

Drawdowns

BKPIX vs. UGPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKPIX drawdown since its inception was -96.22%, roughly equal to the maximum UGPIX drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKPIX and UGPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKPIX	UGPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.22%	-99.66%	+3.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.69%	-52.67%	+30.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.94%	-53.13%	+15.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.71%	-98.24%	+36.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.21%	-99.10%	+32.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.47%	-97.87%	+51.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.09%	-82.71%	+26.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.63%	28.73%	-20.10%

Volatility

BKPIX vs. UGPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund (BKPIX) is 7.98%, while ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a volatility of 18.51%. This indicates that BKPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKPIX	UGPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.98%	18.51%	-10.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.06%	36.57%	-14.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.23%	52.09%	-19.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.75%	390.11%	-349.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.42%	277.98%	-234.56%

BKPIX vs. UGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKPIX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is lower than UGPIX's 1.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKPIX vs. UGPIX - Dividend Comparison

BKPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than UGPIX's 8.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKPIX ProFunds Banks UltraSector Fund	1.35%	1.42%	0.75%	1.64%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.38%	1.53%	0.00%
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina	8.06%	6.05%	2.91%	3.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.00%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKPIX and UGPIX in my portfolio?

BKPIX and UGPIX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKPIX or UGPIX?

UGPIX has higher volatility (18.51%) compared to BKPIX (7.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKPIX dropped -96.22% vs UGPIX's -99.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.