BKNU vs. INTW
BKNU (T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
BKNU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKNU
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 552.98%
- 6M
- 433.74%
- 1Y
- 1,596.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKNU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BKNU T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF | -39.53% | -14.43% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 552.98% | 90.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKNU and INTW is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKNU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
BKNU
INTW
BKNU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF (BKNU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKNU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 11.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 3.33 | — |
Drawdowns
BKNU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKNU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -60.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -27.77% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -30.06% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.12% | — |
Volatility
BKNU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKNU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 42.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 110.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 143.34% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 145.01% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 145.01% | — |
BKNU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BKNU and INTW have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
BKNU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither BKNU nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BKNU and INTW have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKNU and INTW have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
BKNU and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and GraniteShares.
Find the right allocation for BKNU and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer