PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKNG vs. UBER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BKNG vs. UBER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKNG achieves a -24.65% return, which is significantly lower than UBER's -16.03% return.


BKNG

1D
-2.04%
1M
2.06%
YTD
-24.65%
6M
-23.53%
1Y
-26.20%
3Y*
16.32%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.01%

UBER

1D
-2.51%
1M
-9.90%
YTD
-16.03%
6M
-18.48%
1Y
-20.58%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKNG vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
-24.65%8.59%41.31%76.02%-16.00%7.72%8.45%18.30%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-16.03%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%71.49%-29.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BKNG and UBER is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.44

The correlation between BKNG and UBER shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BKNG:

$127.55B

UBER:

$142.12B

EPS

BKNG:

$7.60

UBER:

$4.05

PE Ratio

BKNG:

21.14

UBER:

16.92

PEG Ratio

BKNG:

0.32

UBER:

0.11

PS Ratio

BKNG:

4.70

UBER:

2.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

BKNG:

$27.69B

UBER:

$53.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BKNG:

$22.16B

UBER:

$22.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

BKNG:

$9.27B

UBER:

$5.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKNG vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKNG
BKNG Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BKNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BKNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKNG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKNG vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKNGUBERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.91

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.66

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.51

-1.16

-0.35

BKNG vs. UBER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the UBER Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKNG and UBER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKNGUBERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.82

-0.63

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.15

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.14

0.00

Drawdowns

BKNG vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKNG drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than UBER's maximum drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKNG and UBER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKNGUBERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.32%

-68.05%

-31.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.35%

-31.46%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.35%

-31.46%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.53%

-60.45%

+20.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.36%

-31.46%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.06%

-25.66%

-21.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.35%

17.72%

-0.37%

Volatility

BKNG vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) is 7.52%, while Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) has a volatility of 7.96%. This indicates that BKNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKNGUBERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.52%

7.96%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.80%

24.06%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.88%

32.62%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.26%

44.83%

-12.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.45%

50.64%

-18.19%

Dividends

BKNG vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison

BKNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while UBER has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
1.00%0.72%0.70%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BKNG vs. UBER - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booking Holdings Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
5.53B
13.20B
(BKNG) Total Revenue
(UBER) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BKNG vs. UBER - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Booking Holdings Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
45.0%
Portfolio components
BKNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

UBER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

BKNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

UBER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

BKNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.

UBER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BKNG and UBER have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBER has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to BKNG (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKNG dropped -99.32% vs UBER's -68.05%.

UBER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKNG and UBER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer