PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKNG vs. ORCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BKNG vs. ORCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) and Oracle Corporation (ORCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKNG achieves a -23.87% return, which is significantly lower than ORCL's 9.34% return. Over the past 10 years, BKNG has underperformed ORCL with an annualized return of 12.13%, while ORCL has yielded a comparatively higher 20.30% annualized return.


BKNG

1D
-2.13%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
-23.87%
6M
-21.25%
1Y
-27.12%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
12.13%

ORCL

1D
-0.87%
1M
8.10%
YTD
9.34%
6M
-3.36%
1Y
22.94%
3Y*
25.94%
5Y*
21.81%
10Y*
20.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKNG vs. ORCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
-23.87%8.59%41.31%76.02%-16.00%7.72%8.45%19.24%-0.88%18.53%
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
9.34%18.13%59.99%30.94%-4.65%36.89%24.25%19.34%-2.97%24.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BKNG and ORCL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1999

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between BKNG and ORCL has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BKNG:

$128.87B

ORCL:

$617.24B

EPS

BKNG:

$7.60

ORCL:

$5.56

PE Ratio

BKNG:

21.36

ORCL:

38.09

PEG Ratio

BKNG:

0.32

ORCL:

8.54

PS Ratio

BKNG:

4.75

ORCL:

9.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

BKNG:

$27.69B

ORCL:

$64.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BKNG:

$22.16B

ORCL:

$58.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

BKNG:

$9.27B

ORCL:

$17.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKNG vs. ORCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKNG
BKNG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BKNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BKNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKNG Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

ORCL
ORCL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ORCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ORCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ORCL Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ORCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ORCL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKNG vs. ORCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) and Oracle Corporation (ORCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKNGORCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.13

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

0.40

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.58

0.66

-2.24

BKNG vs. ORCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the ORCL Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKNG and ORCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKNGORCLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.86

0.35

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.52

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.58

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.49

-0.36

Drawdowns

BKNG vs. ORCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKNG drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than ORCL's maximum drawdown of -84.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKNG and ORCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKNGORCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.32%

-84.19%

-15.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.35%

-58.25%

+24.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.35%

-58.25%

+24.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.53%

-58.25%

+18.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.77%

-58.25%

+10.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.64%

-34.98%

+5.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.07%

-29.10%

-17.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.16%

35.04%

-17.88%

Volatility

BKNG vs. ORCL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) is 9.32%, while Oracle Corporation (ORCL) has a volatility of 21.62%. This indicates that BKNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ORCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKNGORCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.32%

21.62%

-12.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.96%

42.42%

-15.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.89%

65.38%

-33.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.24%

41.98%

-9.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.46%

35.01%

-2.55%

Dividends

BKNG vs. ORCL - Dividend Comparison

BKNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than ORCL's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
0.99%0.72%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
0.94%0.97%0.96%1.44%1.57%1.38%1.48%1.72%1.68%1.52%1.56%1.56%

Financials

BKNG vs. ORCL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booking Holdings Inc. and Oracle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
5.53B
17.19B
(BKNG) Total Revenue
(ORCL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BKNG and ORCL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ORCL has higher volatility (21.62%) compared to BKNG (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKNG dropped -99.32% vs ORCL's -84.19%.

ORCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKNG and ORCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer