BKMS vs. UGA
BKMS (BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund, LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMS is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Near-Month NYMEX RBOB Gasoline Futures Contract. BKMS is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Their -0.25 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BKMS charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for UGA.
Performance
BKMS vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMS
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 57.40%
- YTD
- 73.74%
- 1Y
- 71.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 23.69%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $790.45K | $878.97K | $1.09M | |
| $8.76M | $6.07M | $5.03M |
BKMS vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 0.77% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP | 67.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMS and UGA is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMS vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
BKMS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UGA
BKMS vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF (BKMS) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKMS | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKMS vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMS drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMS and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMS | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -86.59% | +85.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -14.19% | +14.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -36.52% | +36.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.30% | — |
Volatility
BKMS vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMS | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30% | 36.60% | -35.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.30% | 34.73% | -33.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.30% | 37.32% | -36.02% |
BKMS vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMS vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
BKMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 1.67% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMS and UGA have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for UGA.
BKMS has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
BKMS is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMS and 1.02% for UGA.
Find the right allocation for BKMS and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer