BKMS vs. BKCI
BKMS (BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF) and BKCI (BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMS is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BKCI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. Both are actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKMS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BKCI.
Performance
BKMS vs. BKCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMS
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCI
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- 4.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKMS vs. BKCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 0.54% |
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF | -1.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMS and BKCI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMS vs. BKCI — Risk / Return Rank
BKMS
BKCI
BKMS vs. BKCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF (BKMS) and BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKMS | BKCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.07 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
BKMS vs. BKCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMS drawdown since its inception was -0.87%, smaller than the maximum BKCI drawdown of -31.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMS and BKCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMS | BKCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -31.03% | +30.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -2.56% | +2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -9.39% | +9.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.60% | — |
Volatility
BKMS vs. BKCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMS | BKCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24% | 14.53% | -13.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.24% | 16.65% | -15.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.24% | 16.65% | -15.41% |
BKMS vs. BKCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BKCI's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMS vs. BKCI - Dividend Comparison
BKMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than BKCI's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF | 1.36% | 1.39% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.46% |
BKMS BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMS and BKCI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BKCI.
BKCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.11% for BKMS.
BKMS is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BKCI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMS and 0.80% for BKCI.
Find the right allocation for BKMS and BKCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer