BKMI vs. XOP
BKMI (BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF) and XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while XOP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. BKMI is actively managed, while XOP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
BKMI vs. XOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMI
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOP
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 28.90%
- YTD
- 33.00%
- 1Y
- 34.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- 17.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.71%
BKMI vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF | -0.01% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 31.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMI and XOP is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMI vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank
BKMI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XOP
BKMI vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKMI | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKMI vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMI drawdown since its inception was -2.99%, smaller than the maximum XOP drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMI and XOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMI | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -90.27% | +87.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -37.84% | +36.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -42.57% | +41.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.59% | — |
Volatility
BKMI vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMI | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86% | 28.20% | -25.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.86% | 33.66% | -30.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.86% | 40.15% | -37.29% |
BKMI vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BKMI and XOP have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
BKMI vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison
BKMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than XOP's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 1.95% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMI and XOP have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMI and XOP have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
XOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.28% for BKMI.
BKMI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XOP is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and State Street.
Find the right allocation for BKMI and XOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer