PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKMI vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKMI vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BKMI

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.49%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UGA

1D
-0.19%
1M
-12.35%
YTD
75.49%
6M
64.35%
1Y
80.94%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
25.10%
10Y*
14.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKMI vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BKMI and UGA is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

-0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKMI vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKMI

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKMI vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BKMI vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKMIUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.12

+0.11

Drawdowns

BKMI vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKMI drawdown since its inception was -2.99%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMI and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKMIUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-86.59%

+83.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-12.35%

+11.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.17%

-36.76%

+35.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

Volatility

BKMI vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKMIUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

35.14%

-32.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.88%

34.38%

-31.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.88%

37.27%

-34.39%

BKMI vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKMI vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

BKMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BKMI and UGA have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BKMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BKMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

BKMI has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

BKMI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMI and 0.75% for UGA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKMI and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer