BKMI vs. NRGU
BKMI (BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while NRGU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). BKMI is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. BKMI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.
Performance
BKMI vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMI
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRGU
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- 129.31%
- 6M
- 97.01%
- 1Y
- 156.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKMI vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF | 0.26% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 107.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMI and NRGU is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | -0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMI vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank
BKMI
NRGU
BKMI vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKMI | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.45 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
BKMI vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMI drawdown since its inception was -2.99%, smaller than the maximum NRGU drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMI and NRGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMI | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -57.50% | +54.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -20.91% | +19.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.17% | -25.42% | +24.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.96% | — |
Volatility
BKMI vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMI | NRGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 31.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 61.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88% | 75.15% | -72.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.88% | 89.15% | -86.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.88% | 89.15% | -86.27% |
BKMI vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMI vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison
BKMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF | 0.98% |
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMI and NRGU have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGU.
BKMI has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.
BKMI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while NRGU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMI and 0.95% for NRGU.
Find the right allocation for BKMI and NRGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer