BKMI vs. BSMR
BKMI (BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF) and BSMR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. BKMI is actively managed, while BSMR is passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKMI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMR.
Performance
BKMI vs. BSMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMI
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMR
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- 0.48%
- 10Y*
- —
BKMI vs. BSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF | 0.26% |
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMI and BSMR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMI vs. BSMR — Risk / Return Rank
BKMI
BSMR
BKMI vs. BSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKMI | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.22 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
BKMI vs. BSMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMI drawdown since its inception was -2.99%, smaller than the maximum BSMR drawdown of -13.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMI and BSMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMI | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -13.49% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | 0.00% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.17% | -3.49% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility
BKMI vs. BSMR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMI | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88% | 1.25% | +1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.88% | 3.03% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.88% | 5.72% | -2.84% |
BKMI vs. BSMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMR's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMI vs. BSMR - Dividend Comparison
BKMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than BSMR's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.72% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.72% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 1.49% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMI and BSMR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BKMI.
BSMR has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.98% for BKMI.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMI and 0.18% for BSMR.
Find the right allocation for BKMI and BSMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer