PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKMC vs. GLRY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKMC vs. GLRY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKMC achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than GLRY's 16.65% return.


BKMC

1D
0.40%
1M
3.22%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.55%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*

GLRY

1D
1.71%
1M
1.63%
YTD
16.65%
6M
15.36%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKMC vs. GLRY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKMC
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
11.69%8.74%13.78%17.50%-16.03%23.83%1.61%
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
16.65%16.50%16.59%19.58%-22.50%15.97%4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BKMC and GLRY is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.87

The correlation between BKMC and GLRY shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKMC vs. GLRY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKMC
GLRY

Industrials

22.9%
24.6%

Technology

16.2%
32.3%

Financial Services

12.4%
10.2%

Healthcare

11.4%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
11.9%

Real Estate

7.6%
2.6%

Basic Materials

4.6%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
1.4%

Communication Services

3.5%
1.6%

Energy

3.3%
2.5%

Utilities

2.4%
3.0%

Industrials

BKMC
22.9%
GLRY
24.6%

Technology

BKMC
16.2%
GLRY
32.3%

Financial Services

BKMC
12.4%
GLRY
10.2%

Healthcare

BKMC
11.4%
GLRY
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BKMC
9.1%
GLRY
11.9%

Real Estate

BKMC
7.6%
GLRY
2.6%

Basic Materials

BKMC
4.6%
GLRY
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

BKMC
4.3%
GLRY
1.4%

Communication Services

BKMC
3.5%
GLRY
1.6%

Energy

BKMC
3.3%
GLRY
2.5%

Utilities

BKMC
2.4%
GLRY
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKMC vs. GLRY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKMC
BKMC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BKMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BKMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GLRY
GLRY Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
GLRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLRY Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GLRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLRY Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKMC vs. GLRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKMCGLRYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

1.67

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

2.28

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.82

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.72

9.83

-0.11

BKMC vs. GLRY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the GLRY Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKMC and GLRY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKMCGLRYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.67

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.44

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.52

+0.31

Drawdowns

BKMC vs. GLRY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, smaller than the maximum GLRY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and GLRY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKMCGLRYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.02%

-40.60%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-10.89%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.68%

-20.50%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.02%

-34.63%

+9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.31%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-16.05%

+9.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

3.13%

-0.58%

Volatility

BKMC vs. GLRY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) is 4.20%, while Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that BKMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKMCGLRYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

5.63%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

15.18%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.12%

18.19%

-3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.77%

20.06%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.16%

21.41%

-2.25%

BKMC vs. GLRY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than GLRY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKMC vs. GLRY - Dividend Comparison

BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than GLRY's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKMC
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
1.38%1.35%1.54%1.38%1.63%1.15%0.86%
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
0.24%0.34%0.52%1.07%1.04%4.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKMC and GLRY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLRY has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to BKMC (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKMC dropped -25.02% vs GLRY's -40.60%.

On 5-year performance, GLRY leads with 8.85% vs 8.06% for BKMC. On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLRY has performed better with a 8.85% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GLRY.

BKMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.24% for GLRY.

BKMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while GLRY is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKMC and 0.85% for GLRY.

GLRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKMC and GLRY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer