BKMC vs. GLRY
BKMC (BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) and GLRY (Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index, while GLRY is a Momentum fund actively managed by Inspire. BKMC is passively managed, while GLRY is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKMC returned 8.06%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for GLRY. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BKMC charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GLRY.
Performance
BKMC vs. GLRY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKMC achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than GLRY's 16.65% return.
BKMC
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.55%
- 1Y
- 24.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- —
GLRY
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 15.36%
- 1Y
- 30.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- —
BKMC vs. GLRY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 11.69% | 8.74% | 13.78% | 17.50% | -16.03% | 23.83% | 1.61% |
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 16.65% | 16.50% | 16.59% | 19.58% | -22.50% | 15.97% | 4.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMC and GLRY is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between BKMC and GLRY shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BKMC vs. GLRY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKMC
GLRY
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
BKMC
GLRY
Technology
BKMC
GLRY
Financial Services
BKMC
GLRY
Healthcare
BKMC
GLRY
Consumer Cyclical
BKMC
GLRY
Real Estate
BKMC
GLRY
Basic Materials
BKMC
GLRY
Consumer Defensive
BKMC
GLRY
Communication Services
BKMC
GLRY
Energy
BKMC
GLRY
Utilities
BKMC
GLRY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMC vs. GLRY — Risk / Return Rank
BKMC
GLRY
BKMC vs. GLRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKMC | GLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | 1.67 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 2.28 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 2.82 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | 9.83 | -0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKMC | GLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 1.67 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.44 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.52 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
BKMC vs. GLRY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, smaller than the maximum GLRY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and GLRY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMC | GLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.02% | -40.60% | +15.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -10.89% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.68% | -20.50% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.02% | -34.63% | +9.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.31% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -16.05% | +9.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.13% | -0.58% |
Volatility
BKMC vs. GLRY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) is 4.20%, while Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that BKMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMC | GLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 5.63% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 15.18% | -4.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.12% | 18.19% | -3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 20.06% | -1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 21.41% | -2.25% |
BKMC vs. GLRY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than GLRY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMC vs. GLRY - Dividend Comparison
BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than GLRY's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.38% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.38% | 1.63% | 1.15% | 0.86% |
GLRY Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF | 0.24% | 0.34% | 0.52% | 1.07% | 1.04% | 4.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMC and GLRY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLRY has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to BKMC (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKMC dropped -25.02% vs GLRY's -40.60%.
On 5-year performance, GLRY leads with 8.85% vs 8.06% for BKMC. On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLRY has performed better with a 8.85% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GLRY.
BKMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.24% for GLRY.
BKMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while GLRY is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKMC and 0.85% for GLRY.
GLRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKMC and GLRY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer