BKMC vs. FFSM
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM).
BKMC and FFSM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BKMC is a passively managed fund by BNY Mellon that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2020. FFSM is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 2, 2021.
Performance
BKMC vs. FFSM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BKMC vs. FFSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.26% | 8.74% | 13.78% | 17.50% | -16.03% | 18.51% |
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF | 4.24% | 14.89% | 14.38% | 17.30% | -16.35% | 19.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKMC achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than FFSM's 4.24% return.
BKMC
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 16.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- —
FFSM
- 1D
- 3.63%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- 4.24%
- 6M
- 9.66%
- 1Y
- 27.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BKMC vs. FFSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSM's 0.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BKMC vs. FFSM — Risk / Return Rank
BKMC
FFSM
BKMC vs. FFSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKMC | FFSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 1.21 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.78 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.25 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.91 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 8.09 | -2.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKMC | FFSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 1.21 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.40 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.47 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMC and FFSM is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BKMC vs. FFSM - Dividend Comparison
BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than FFSM's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.34% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.38% | 1.63% | 1.15% | 0.86% |
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.53% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 0.37% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BKMC vs. FFSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, smaller than the maximum FFSM drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and FFSM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMC | FFSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.02% | -26.65% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | -14.42% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.02% | -26.65% | +1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -7.11% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -8.06% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.40% | -0.09% |
Volatility
BKMC vs. FFSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) is 6.08%, while Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that BKMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BKMC | FFSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 8.38% | -2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 13.80% | -2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.91% | 22.75% | -1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 20.55% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 20.61% | -1.32% |