BKMC vs. BCPL
BKMC (BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) and BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index, while BCPL is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. BKMC is passively managed, while BCPL is actively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BKMC charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BCPL.
Performance
BKMC vs. BCPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMC
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 11.65%
- 1Y
- 19.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.39%
BCPL
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $653.50K | $1.05M | $1.39M | |
| $1.12M | $1.07M | $1.01M |
BKMC vs. BCPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 5.88% |
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | -0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMC and BCPL is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMC vs. BCPL — Risk / Return Rank
BKMC
BCPL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BKMC vs. BCPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKMC | BCPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKMC vs. BCPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, which is greater than BCPL's maximum drawdown of -2.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and BCPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMC | BCPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.02% | -2.95% | -22.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -2.16% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.42% | -1.09% | -5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | — | — |
Volatility
BKMC vs. BCPL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMC | BCPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 3.94% | +11.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 3.94% | +14.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 3.94% | +15.10% |
BKMC vs. BCPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BCPL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMC vs. BCPL - Dividend Comparison
BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than BCPL's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.38% | 1.63% | 1.15% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMC and BCPL have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BCPL.
BCPL has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.42% for BKMC.
BKMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BCPL is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKMC and 0.40% for BCPL.
Find the right allocation for BKMC and BCPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer