BKMC vs. BCPL
BKMC (BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) and BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index, while BCPL is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. BKMC is passively managed, while BCPL is actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKMC charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BCPL.
Performance
BKMC vs. BCPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMC
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 6M
- 9.13%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- —
BCPL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKMC vs. BCPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 5.58% |
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMC and BCPL is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMC vs. BCPL — Risk / Return Rank
BKMC
BCPL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BKMC vs. BCPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKMC | BCPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKMC vs. BCPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, which is greater than BCPL's maximum drawdown of -2.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and BCPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMC | BCPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.02% | -2.95% | -22.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.00% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -1.04% | -5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | — | — |
Volatility
BKMC vs. BCPL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMC | BCPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 4.02% | +11.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 4.02% | +14.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 4.02% | +15.13% |
BKMC vs. BCPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BCPL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMC vs. BCPL - Dividend Comparison
BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than BCPL's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.38% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.38% | 1.63% | 1.15% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMC and BCPL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BCPL.
BCPL has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.38% for BKMC.
BKMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BCPL is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKMC and 0.40% for BCPL.
Find the right allocation for BKMC and BCPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer