BKIE vs. IWP

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) and IWP (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR, while IWP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKIE returned 9.60%/yr vs 4.51%/yr for IWP. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKIE charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWP.

Performance

BKIE vs. IWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKIE achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly higher than IWP's 0.63% return.

BKIE

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -1.34%
• 6M: 5.02%
• YTD: 8.78%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 15.90%
• 5Y*: 9.60%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.64%

IWP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.07%
• 6M: -2.52%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 1Y: -1.82%
• 3Y*: 12.07%
• 5Y*: 4.51%
• 10Y*: 11.64%
• ALL TIME*: 9.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKIE vs. IWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF	8.78%	32.08%	4.63%	18.25%	-13.60%	13.75%	34.17%
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.63%	8.45%	21.86%	25.70%	-26.90%	12.60%	53.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BKIE and IWP is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020	0.68

The correlation between BKIE and IWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKIE vs. IWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKIE	IWP
Financial Services	26.6%	3.9%
Industrials	17.9%	20.7%
Technology	11.7%	33.5%
Healthcare	9.1%	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	13.3%
Basic Materials	6.7%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	1.2%
Energy	5.0%	4.3%
Communication Services	4.1%	3.3%
Utilities	3.5%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.2%

Return for Risk

BKIE vs. IWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKIE

BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 54
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

IWP

IWP Risk / Return Rank: 9
IWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
IWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
IWP Omega Ratio Rank: 9
IWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
IWP Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKIE vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKIE	IWP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	-0.11	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	-0.03	+2.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.00	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	-0.12	+2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.24	-0.35	+7.59

BKIE vs. IWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the IWP Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKIE and IWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKIE vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKIE drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, smaller than the maximum IWP drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIE and IWP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKIE	IWP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.19%	-56.92%	+28.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.41%	-14.79%	+3.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.19%	-25.20%	+12.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.19%	-38.62%	+10.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.34%	-6.02%	+3.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-9.65%	+4.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	5.19%	-2.22%

Volatility

BKIE vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) is 3.70%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that BKIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKIE	IWP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	5.06%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.03%	13.78%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.22%	17.32%	-2.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.18%	22.44%	-6.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.32%	21.69%	-5.37%

BKIE vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKIE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IWP's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BKIE vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison

BKIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than IWP's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF	3.23%	3.12%	3.31%	2.88%	2.97%	2.58%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.37%	0.40%	0.54%	0.77%	0.30%	0.38%	0.59%	1.02%	0.78%	1.16%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKIE and IWP in my portfolio?

BKIE and IWP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKIE or IWP?

IWP has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to BKIE (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIE dropped -28.19% vs IWP's -56.92%.

Which ETF is better, BKIE or IWP?

On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 9.60% vs 4.51% for IWP. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKIE or IWP?

Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 9.60% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKIE or IWP?

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKIE or IWP?

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.36% for IWP.

What is the main difference between BKIE and IWP?

BKIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IWP is Mid Cap Growth Equities. BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR, while IWP tracks Russell Midcap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKIE and 0.23% for IWP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.