BKIE vs. DFIV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BKIE is passively managed, while DFIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKIE returned 17.04%/yr vs 23.38%/yr for DFIV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BKIE charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.

Performance

BKIE vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKIE achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 12.20% return.

BKIE

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 9.51%
• 6M: 10.84%
• 1Y: 22.01%
• 3Y*: 17.04%
• 5Y*: 9.17%
• 10Y*: —

DFIV

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 12.20%
• 6M: 13.92%
• 1Y: 33.45%
• 3Y*: 23.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKIE vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF	9.51%	32.08%	4.63%	18.25%	-13.60%	-0.18%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	12.20%	45.36%	7.26%	17.75%	-3.70%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BKIE and DFIV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021	0.93

The correlation between BKIE and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKIE vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKIE	DFIV
Financial Services	25.8%	32.4%
Industrials	18.6%	9.6%
Technology	10.1%	2.8%
Healthcare	9.1%	4.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	9.6%
Basic Materials	7.2%	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	4.9%
Energy	5.9%	16.4%
Communication Services	4.2%	4.2%
Utilities	3.7%	2.5%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.8%

Return for Risk

BKIE vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKIE

BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 47
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 50

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 82
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKIE vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKIE	DFIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.39	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	3.26	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.43	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	3.48	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.45	13.34	-5.89

BKIE vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKIE and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKIE vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKIE drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIE and DFIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKIE	DFIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.19%	-25.42%	-2.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.41%	-9.66%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.19%	-14.72%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-0.43%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.96%	-4.46%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	2.52%	+0.45%

Volatility

BKIE vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 4.50%. This indicates that BKIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKIE	DFIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	4.50%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.78%	11.46%	+1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.14%	14.10%	+1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.22%	16.66%	-0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.38%	16.66%	-0.28%

BKIE vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKIE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BKIE vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

BKIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than DFIV's 2.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF	3.23%	3.12%	3.31%	2.88%	2.97%	2.58%	1.49%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.54%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKIE and DFIV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, BKIE and DFIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BKIE or DFIV?

BKIE has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to DFIV (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIE dropped -28.19% vs DFIV's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, BKIE or DFIV?

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.38% vs 17.04% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKIE or DFIV?

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.38% return vs 17.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKIE or DFIV?

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKIE or DFIV?

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 2.54% for DFIV.

What is the main difference between BKIE and DFIV?

They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKIE and 0.27% for DFIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.