BKHYY vs. ISRG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bank Hapoalim ADR (BKHYY) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG).

Performance

BKHYY vs. ISRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bank Hapoalim ADR (BKHYY) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BKHYY vs. ISRG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKHYY Bank Hapoalim ADR	0.10%	116.43%	38.07%	8.17%	-14.54%	61.91%	-15.42%	36.49%	-15.11%	28.29%
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc.	-18.60%	8.51%	54.72%	27.14%	-26.15%	31.76%	38.39%	23.43%	31.23%	72.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BKHYY : $30.74B ISRG : $166.14B
EPS BKHYY : $34.01 ISRG : $7.89
PE Ratio BKHYY : 3.44 ISRG : 58.45
PEG Ratio BKHYY : 0.20 ISRG : 3.58
PS Ratio BKHYY : 0.78 ISRG : 16.59
PB Ratio BKHYY : 0.48 ISRG : 9.32
Total Revenue (TTM) BKHYY : $39.50B ISRG : $10.06B
Gross Profit (TTM) BKHYY : $21.15B ISRG : $6.64B
EBITDA (TTM) BKHYY : $15.04B ISRG : $3.62B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKHYY achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than ISRG's -18.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BKHYY having a 21.19% annualized return and ISRG not far ahead at 21.20%.

BKHYY

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -4.81%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 6M: 17.92%
• 1Y: 82.11%
• 3Y*: 47.08%
• 5Y*: 31.31%
• 10Y*: 21.19%

ISRG

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -8.44%
• YTD: -18.60%
• 6M: 3.08%
• 1Y: -6.92%
• 3Y*: 21.74%
• 5Y*: 13.09%
• 10Y*: 21.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BKHYY vs. ISRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKHYY

BKHYY Risk / Return Rank: 92
BKHYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BKHYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
BKHYY Omega Ratio Rank: 91
BKHYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BKHYY Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ISRG

ISRG Risk / Return Rank: 32
ISRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
ISRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
ISRG Omega Ratio Rank: 29
ISRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ISRG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKHYY vs. ISRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank Hapoalim ADR (BKHYY) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKHYY	ISRG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	-0.21	+2.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	-0.08	+3.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	0.99	+0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.10	-0.26	+4.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.98	-0.49	+16.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKHYY vs. ISRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKHYY Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the ISRG Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKHYY and ISRG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKHYY	ISRG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	-0.21	+2.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.40	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.66	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.49	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between BKHYY and ISRG is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BKHYY vs. ISRG - Dividend Comparison

BKHYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, while ISRG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKHYY Bank Hapoalim ADR	4.01%	3.27%	4.09%	5.69%	2.56%	3.08%	0.00%	4.63%	1.42%	2.67%	3.08%	1.41%
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BKHYY vs. ISRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKHYY drawdown since its inception was -69.05%, smaller than the maximum ISRG drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKHYY and ISRG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKHYY	ISRG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.05%	-82.26%	+13.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.55%	-24.09%	+4.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.39%	-49.90%	+13.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.47%	-49.90%	+3.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.52%	-24.48%	+7.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.07%	-21.24%	+4.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	12.78%	-7.77%

Volatility

BKHYY vs. ISRG - Volatility Comparison

Bank Hapoalim ADR (BKHYY) has a higher volatility of 9.78% compared to Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) at 6.47%. This indicates that BKHYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKHYY	ISRG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.78%	6.47%	+3.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.51%	22.11%	+2.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.76%	33.82%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.73%	33.02%	+10.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.79%	32.10%	+7.69%

Financials

BKHYY vs. ISRG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bank Hapoalim ADR and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BKHYY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank Hapoalim ADR reported a gross profit of 2.82B and revenue of 6.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.0%.

ISRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 2.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

BKHYY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank Hapoalim ADR reported an operating income of 2.97B and revenue of 6.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.3%.

ISRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported an operating income of 864.30M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.2%.

BKHYY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bank Hapoalim ADR reported a net income of 1.36B and revenue of 6.71B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.

ISRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. reported a net income of 794.80M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in a net margin of 27.7%.