BKHY vs. HYLB
BKHY (BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF) and HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - BKHY tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index while HYLB tracks the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKHY returned 4.07%/yr vs 4.01%/yr for HYLB. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BKHY charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HYLB.
Performance
BKHY vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKHY achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly higher than HYLB's 2.33% return.
BKHY
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 5.76%
- 3Y*
- 8.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.55%
HYLB
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 5.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.29M | $953.81K | $870.21K | |
| $46.99M | $36.76M | $41.90M |
BKHY vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKHY BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF | 2.54% | 8.48% | 8.37% | 12.40% | -10.97% | 4.75% | 17.83% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.33% | 8.74% | 8.14% | 12.03% | -10.80% | 3.94% | 15.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKHY and HYLB is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between BKHY and HYLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKHY vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank
BKHY
HYLB
BKHY vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKHY | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.44 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.28 | 10.27 | +0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKHY vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKHY drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum HYLB drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKHY and HYLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKHY | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.89% | -22.91% | +7.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.53% | -2.27% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.87% | -4.51% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.89% | -15.54% | -0.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -2.39% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.54% | +0.02% |
Volatility
BKHY vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) have volatilities of 0.89% and 0.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKHY | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 0.86% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.11% | 3.10% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 3.76% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.59% | 7.48% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.28% | 8.12% | -0.84% |
BKHY vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKHY has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BKHY vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison
BKHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than HYLB's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKHY BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF | 7.41% | 7.33% | 7.34% | 8.67% | 6.59% | 6.78% | 4.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.53% | 6.29% | 6.31% | 5.84% | 5.53% | 4.45% | 5.22% | 5.71% | 5.95% | 5.85% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, BKHY and HYLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BKHY has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to HYLB (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKHY dropped -15.89% vs HYLB's -22.91%.
On 5-year performance, BKHY leads with 4.07% vs 4.01% for HYLB. On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKHY has performed better with a 4.07% return vs 4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for BKHY.
BKHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 6.53% for HYLB.
BKHY tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index, while HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for BKHY and 0.15% for HYLB.
BKHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKHY and HYLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer