BKGI vs. POW
BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKGI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKGI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
BKGI vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKGI achieves a 13.23% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.
BKGI
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- 20.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POW
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- 6M
- 31.71%
- YTD
- 38.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKGI vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 13.23% | 2.00% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 38.93% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKGI and POW is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKGI vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
BKGI
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BKGI vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKGI | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKGI vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKGI drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKGI and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKGI | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.79% | -18.37% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -18.37% | +16.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -4.33% | +1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | — | — |
Volatility
BKGI vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKGI | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.71% | 32.94% | -21.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 32.94% | -18.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 32.94% | -18.94% |
BKGI vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKGI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKGI vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
BKGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF | 2.91% | 2.65% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 0.53% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKGI and POW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKGI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKGI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
BKGI is categorized as Energy Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BKGI and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for BKGI and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer