BKFI vs. XOP
BKFI (BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF) and XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKFI is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while XOP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. BKFI is actively managed, while XOP is passively managed. Their -0.44 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BKFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XOP.
Performance
BKFI vs. XOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKFI
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XOP
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 27.63%
- YTD
- 41.76%
- 1Y
- 46.74%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- 19.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $291.85K | $607.01K | $1.20M | |
| $553.31M | $544.38M | $598.08M |
BKFI vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | -1.23% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 40.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKFI and XOP is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | -0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKFI vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank
BKFI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XOP
BKFI vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKFI | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKFI vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKFI drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum XOP drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKFI and XOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKFI | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -90.27% | +87.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -33.74% | +31.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.35% | -42.56% | +41.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.67% | — |
Volatility
BKFI vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKFI | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.18% | 28.49% | -24.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.18% | 33.53% | -29.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.18% | 40.15% | -35.97% |
BKFI vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKFI vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison
BKFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than XOP's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 1.83% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKFI and XOP have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BKFI.
BKFI has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.83% for XOP.
BKFI is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while XOP is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BKFI and 0.35% for XOP.
Find the right allocation for BKFI and XOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer