BKFI vs. UGA
BKFI (BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BKFI is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. BKFI is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.49, they often move in opposite directions. BKFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
BKFI vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKFI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 65.75%
- YTD
- 71.80%
- 1Y
- 66.14%
- 3Y*
- 17.96%
- 5Y*
- 23.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
BKFI vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | -0.26% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 65.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKFI and UGA is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | -0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKFI vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
BKFI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UGA
BKFI vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKFI | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKFI vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKFI drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKFI and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKFI | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -86.59% | +83.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -14.20% | +12.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -36.64% | +35.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.26% | — |
Volatility
BKFI vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKFI | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17% | 35.39% | -31.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 34.57% | -30.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 37.20% | -33.03% |
BKFI vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKFI vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
BKFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | 2.15% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKFI and UGA have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKFI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKFI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
BKFI has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
BKFI is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BKFI and 0.75% for UGA.
Find the right allocation for BKFI and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer