BKFI vs. SDCI
BKFI (BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF) and SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BKFI is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while SDCI is a Commodities fund tracking the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return. BKFI is actively managed, while SDCI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.39, they often move in opposite directions. BKFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SDCI.
Performance
BKFI vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKFI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDCI
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 22.42%
- YTD
- 24.19%
- 1Y
- 28.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 20.07%
- 10Y*
- —
BKFI vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | -0.26% |
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 22.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKFI and SDCI is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | -0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKFI vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank
BKFI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SDCI
BKFI vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKFI | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKFI vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKFI drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum SDCI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKFI and SDCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKFI | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -45.79% | +42.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -6.59% | +4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -11.53% | +10.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.50% | — |
Volatility
BKFI vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKFI | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17% | 17.04% | -12.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 18.39% | -14.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 17.07% | -12.90% |
BKFI vs. SDCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SDCI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKFI vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison
BKFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than SDCI's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | 2.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 2.96% | 3.68% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 33.49% | 19.26% | 0.20% | 0.93% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKFI and SDCI have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKFI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKFI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SDCI.
SDCI has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 2.15% for BKFI.
BKFI is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while SDCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BKFI and 0.60% for SDCI.
Find the right allocation for BKFI and SDCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer