BKFI vs. IBTM
BKFI (BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF) and IBTM (iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. BKFI is actively managed, while IBTM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BKFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTM.
Performance
BKFI vs. IBTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKFI
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTM
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- -0.38%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 2.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKFI vs. IBTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | -0.02% |
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | -0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKFI and IBTM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKFI vs. IBTM — Risk / Return Rank
BKFI
IBTM
BKFI vs. IBTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKFI | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.20 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
BKFI vs. IBTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKFI drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum IBTM drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKFI and IBTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKFI | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -13.60% | +10.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -2.25% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -4.82% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.13% | — |
Volatility
BKFI vs. IBTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKFI | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.13% | 4.09% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.13% | 7.55% | -3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.13% | 7.55% | -3.42% |
BKFI vs. IBTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTM's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKFI vs. IBTM - Dividend Comparison
BKFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than IBTM's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKFI BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | 3.95% | 3.87% | 3.96% | 3.39% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKFI and IBTM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BKFI.
IBTM has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 1.77% for BKFI.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BKFI and 0.07% for IBTM.
Find the right allocation for BKFI and IBTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer