PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKFI vs. IBTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKFI vs. IBTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BKFI

1D
0.17%
1M
0.20%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBTM

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
-0.38%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
2.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKFI vs. IBTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BKFI and IBTM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKFI vs. IBTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKFI

IBTM
IBTM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IBTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTM Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTM Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKFI vs. IBTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF (BKFI) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BKFI vs. IBTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKFIIBTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.20

-0.22

Drawdowns

BKFI vs. IBTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKFI drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum IBTM drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKFI and IBTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKFIIBTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-13.60%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-2.25%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-4.82%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

Volatility

BKFI vs. IBTM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKFIIBTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13%

4.09%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.13%

7.55%

-3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

7.55%

-3.42%

BKFI vs. IBTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTM's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKFI vs. IBTM - Dividend Comparison

BKFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than IBTM's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BKFI
BNY Mellon Active Core Bond ETF
1.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBTM
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF
3.95%3.87%3.96%3.39%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKFI and IBTM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BKFI.

IBTM has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 1.77% for BKFI.

They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BKFI and 0.07% for IBTM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKFI and IBTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer