PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKDV vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKDV vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKDV vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BKDV
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
2.21%18.58%-0.91%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
-0.03%13.18%-1.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKDV achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's -0.03% return.


BKDV

1D
2.10%
1M
-4.11%
YTD
2.21%
6M
7.34%
1Y
18.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYV

1D
1.69%
1M
-4.55%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
3.21%
1Y
12.90%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKDV vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BKDV vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKDV
BKDV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BKDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BKDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKDV vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKDVSPYVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

0.83

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

1.25

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.15

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.97

5.45

+1.51

BKDV vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKDV and SPYV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKDVSPYVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

0.83

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.41

+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between BKDV and SPYV is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BKDV vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

BKDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than SPYV's 1.82% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKDV
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
0.60%0.62%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.82%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Drawdowns

BKDV vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKDV drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKDV and SPYV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKDVSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.49%

-58.45%

+42.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.07%

-12.03%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-4.55%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-8.77%

+6.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.54%

+0.20%

Volatility

BKDV vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 3.84%. This indicates that BKDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKDVSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

3.84%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

7.76%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.88%

15.54%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

14.44%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

16.96%

-0.91%