PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKDV vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKDV vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BKDV having a 14.68% return and HDV slightly lower at 14.07%.


BKDV

1D
-0.60%
1M
1.80%
YTD
14.68%
6M
13.66%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDV

1D
1.33%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
14.07%
6M
14.08%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKDV vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BKDV
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
14.68%18.58%-0.91%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
14.07%11.90%-3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BKDV and HDV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024

0.55

The correlation between BKDV and HDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKDV vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKDV
HDV

Financial Services

21.7%
4.7%

Technology

15.8%
0.2%

Healthcare

14.5%
22.6%

Industrials

12.5%
3.5%

Energy

7.8%
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
9.2%

Communication Services

6.9%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
24.5%

Basic Materials

4.1%
0.8%

Utilities

1.5%
8.1%

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Financial Services

BKDV
21.7%
HDV
4.7%

Technology

BKDV
15.8%
HDV
0.2%

Healthcare

BKDV
14.5%
HDV
22.6%

Industrials

BKDV
12.5%
HDV
3.5%

Energy

BKDV
7.8%
HDV
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BKDV
7.8%
HDV
9.2%

Communication Services

BKDV
6.9%
HDV
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

BKDV
6.3%
HDV
24.5%

Basic Materials

BKDV
4.1%
HDV
0.8%

Utilities

BKDV
1.5%
HDV
8.1%

Real Estate

BKDV
1.2%
HDV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKDV vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKDV
BKDV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BKDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BKDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKDV vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKDVHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

4.09

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.58

11.19

+4.39

BKDV vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKDV and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKDV vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKDV drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKDV and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKDVHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.49%

-37.04%

+21.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.65%

-5.18%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-1.35%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-3.08%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.89%

-0.06%

Volatility

BKDV vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.64%. This indicates that BKDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKDVHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

3.64%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

7.61%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

9.93%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.71%

12.81%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

15.73%

-0.02%

BKDV vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKDV vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

BKDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than HDV's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKDV
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
0.54%0.62%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.90%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKDV and HDV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKDV has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to HDV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKDV dropped -15.49% vs HDV's -37.04%.

On 1-year performance, BKDV leads with 28.39% vs 21.06% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BKDV has performed better with a 28.39% return vs 21.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BKDV.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.54% for BKDV.

BKDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BKDV and 0.08% for HDV.

BKDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKDV and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer