PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKCI vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKCI vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCI achieves a 3.52% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return.


BKCI

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.93%
YTD
3.52%
6M
4.73%
1Y
6.77%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
10Y*

USO

1D
2.62%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
103.67%
6M
99.35%
1Y
101.55%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCI vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BKCI
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF
3.52%9.94%-2.44%20.27%-20.26%0.38%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
103.67%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCI and USO is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021

0.02

The correlation between BKCI and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.38 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKCI vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCI
BKCI Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BKCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKCI Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BKCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKCI Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCI vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKCIUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.38

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

5.01

-4.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

9.42

-7.53

BKCI vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCI and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKCIUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

2.31

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

-0.18

+0.27

Drawdowns

BKCI vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCI drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCI and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKCIUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.03%

-98.19%

+67.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-20.39%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.02%

-26.05%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-85.01%

+83.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-75.30%

+65.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

10.82%

-7.22%

Volatility

BKCI vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) is 3.62%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that BKCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKCIUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

14.87%

-11.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

38.23%

-26.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

44.20%

-29.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

36.06%

-19.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

39.00%

-22.39%

BKCI vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKCI vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

BKCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BKCI
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF
1.34%1.39%0.78%0.73%0.46%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKCI and USO have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to BKCI (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCI dropped -31.03% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 3-year performance, USO leads with 29.98% vs 4.55% for BKCI. On fees, BKCI is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, BKCI has been the lower-risk option at 3.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USO has performed better with a 29.98% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKCI is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

BKCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

BKCI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BKCI and 0.86% for USO.

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKCI and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer