PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKCH vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKCH vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKCH vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BKCH
Global X Blockchain ETF
-12.18%27.14%18.81%267.06%-85.10%-1.24%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
0.61%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%5.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCH achieves a -12.18% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 0.61% return.


BKCH

1D
0.47%
1M
-12.18%
YTD
-12.18%
6M
-35.21%
1Y
64.27%
3Y*
41.26%
5Y*
10Y*

QYLD

1D
0.58%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
0.61%
6M
7.46%
1Y
16.36%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKCH vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BKCH vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCH
BKCH Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BKCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKCH Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BKCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKCH Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCH vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKCHQYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

1.00

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.61

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.31

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.57

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.73

10.32

-7.59

BKCH vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCH Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCH and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKCHQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

1.00

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.56

-0.65

Correlation

The correlation between BKCH and QYLD is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BKCH vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

BKCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than QYLD's 11.85% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKCH
Global X Blockchain ETF
2.28%2.00%7.61%2.33%1.29%4.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.85%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Drawdowns

BKCH vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCH drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCH and QYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKCHQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.80%

-24.75%

-67.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.28%

-10.84%

-45.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.90%

-1.84%

-56.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.89%

-3.89%

-59.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.78%

1.65%

+25.13%

Volatility

BKCH vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) has a higher volatility of 22.01% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.90%. This indicates that BKCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKCHQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.01%

4.90%

+17.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.53%

7.50%

+49.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.30%

16.43%

+55.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.94%

14.84%

+61.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.94%

15.51%

+60.43%