BKCH vs. CIFU

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BKCH (Global X Blockchain ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCH is a Blockchain fund tracking the Solactive Blockchain Index, while CIFU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. BKCH is passively managed, while CIFU is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BKCH charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIFU.

Performance

BKCH vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCH achieves a 24.56% return, which is significantly lower than CIFU's 74.19% return.

BKCH

• 1D: -5.87%
• 1M: -7.77%
• YTD: 24.56%
• 6M: 14.82%
• 1Y: 67.14%
• 3Y*: 45.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFU

• 1D: -10.40%
• 1M: 27.80%
• YTD: 74.19%
• 6M: 43.22%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCH vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	24.56%	-2.70%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	74.19%	-13.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCH and CIFU is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.87

Return for Risk

BKCH vs. CIFU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCH

BKCH Risk / Return Rank: 27
BKCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BKCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
BKCH Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BKCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BKCH Martin Ratio Rank: 20

CIFU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCH vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKCH	CIFU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.17	—	—

Drawdowns

BKCH vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCH drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than CIFU's maximum drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCH and CIFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCH	CIFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.80%	-77.20%	-14.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.28%	-19.79%	-20.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.83%	-42.78%	-19.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BKCH	CIFU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.63%	206.91%	-136.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.43%	206.91%	-131.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.43%	206.91%	-131.48%

BKCH vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKCH vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

BKCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while CIFU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	1.60%	2.00%	7.61%	2.33%	1.29%	4.28%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCH and CIFU in my portfolio?

BKCH and CIFU have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BKCH or CIFU?

On fees, BKCH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCH or CIFU?

BKCH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKCH or CIFU?

BKCH has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.00% for CIFU.

What is the main difference between BKCH and CIFU?

BKCH is categorized as Blockchain, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCH and 1.50% for CIFU.