PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKCG vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKCG vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCG achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -5.14% return.


BKCG

1D
-0.81%
1M
-5.09%
YTD
-0.50%
6M
-1.21%
1Y
7.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMST

1D
18.45%
1M
181.70%
YTD
-5.14%
6M
2.86%
1Y
236.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCG vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BKCG and SMST is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2025

-0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKCG vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCG
BKCG Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BKCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKCG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BKCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKCG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCG vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKCGSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.30

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

2.79

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

5.52

-3.08

BKCG vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCG Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCG and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKCG vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCG drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCG and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKCGSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-99.25%

+87.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-85.39%

+73.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.35%

-96.27%

+89.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-90.74%

+88.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

43.15%

-40.03%

Volatility

BKCG vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) is 4.97%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 46.13%. This indicates that BKCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKCGSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

46.13%

-41.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

130.40%

-119.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

146.32%

-132.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.13%

167.25%

-149.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.13%

167.25%

-149.12%

BKCG vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKCG vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

BKCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BKCG and SMST have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (46.13%) compared to BKCG (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCG dropped -12.12% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 236.89% vs 7.56% for BKCG. On fees, BKCG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BKCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 236.89% return vs 7.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKCG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

BKCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

BKCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCG and 1.29% for SMST.

SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKCG and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer