BKCG vs. QLC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BKCG (BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF) and QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. BKCG is actively managed, while QLC is passively managed. Over the past year, BKCG returned 13.11% vs 32.11% for QLC. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BKCG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QLC.

Performance

BKCG vs. QLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCG achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than QLC's 10.83% return.

BKCG

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -2.48%
• YTD: 2.16%
• 6M: 2.28%
• 1Y: 13.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLC

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 10.83%
• 6M: 10.21%
• 1Y: 32.11%
• 3Y*: 24.42%
• 5Y*: 15.27%
• 10Y*: 14.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCG vs. QLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BKCG BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF	2.16%	20.29%
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	10.83%	28.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCG and QLC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2025	0.91

The correlation between BKCG and QLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKCG vs. QLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKCG	QLC
Technology	39.7%	37.8%
Financial Services	18.3%	13.2%
Communication Services	12.5%	13.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	7.8%
Industrials	8.4%	6.3%
Healthcare	6.7%	9.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	3.0%
Basic Materials	-	2.0%
Energy	-	2.0%
Real Estate	-	2.1%
Utilities	-	3.1%

Return for Risk

BKCG vs. QLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCG

BKCG Risk / Return Rank: 27
BKCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
BKCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
BKCG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
BKCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BKCG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

QLC

QLC Risk / Return Rank: 80
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCG vs. QLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKCG	QLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	2.50	-1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	3.40	-2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.45	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	3.65	-2.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.30	16.63	-12.33

BKCG vs. QLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCG Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the QLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCG and QLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKCG vs. QLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCG drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum QLC drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCG and QLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCG	QLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.12%	-35.86%	+23.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.12%	-8.84%	-3.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.84%	-1.24%	-2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-4.52%	+2.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	1.94%	+1.11%

Volatility

BKCG vs. QLC - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) have volatilities of 4.78% and 4.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKCG	QLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.78%	4.66%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.13%	10.28%	+0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.71%	12.94%	+0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.15%	16.91%	+1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.15%	18.46%	-0.31%

BKCG vs. QLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QLC's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKCG vs. QLC - Dividend Comparison

BKCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than QLC's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKCG BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF	0.80%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	0.94%	0.94%	1.03%	1.26%	1.46%	0.96%	1.40%	1.91%	1.82%	1.29%	1.80%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCG and QLC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, BKCG and QLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BKCG or QLC?

BKCG has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to QLC (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCG dropped -12.12% vs QLC's -35.86%.

Which ETF is better, BKCG or QLC?

On 1-year performance, QLC leads with 32.11% vs 13.11% for BKCG. On fees, QLC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, QLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKCG or QLC?

Over the 1-year period, QLC has performed better with a 32.11% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCG or QLC?

QLC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BKCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKCG or QLC?

QLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.80% for BKCG.

What is the main difference between BKCG and QLC?

BKCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCG and 0.25% for QLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.