BKCG vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BKCG (BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. BKCG is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past year, BKCG returned 10.62% vs 27.24% for OILK. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. BKCG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

BKCG vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCG achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 40.78% return.

BKCG

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -3.88%
• YTD: 0.70%
• 6M: 0.20%
• 1Y: 10.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OILK

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -13.38%
• YTD: 40.78%
• 6M: 38.63%
• 1Y: 27.24%
• 3Y*: 13.91%
• 5Y*: 13.00%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCG vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BKCG BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF	0.70%	20.29%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	40.78%	-9.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCG and OILK is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2025	-0.18

The correlation between BKCG and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to -0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BKCG vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCG

BKCG Risk / Return Rank: 23
BKCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BKCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BKCG Omega Ratio Rank: 21
BKCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BKCG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 28
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 27
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCG vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKCG	OILK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	0.96	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	1.42	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.18	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	1.57	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.47	3.49	-0.02

BKCG vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCG Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCG and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKCG vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCG drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCG and OILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCG	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.12%	-83.76%	+71.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.12%	-17.41%	+5.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.22%	-17.41%	+12.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.03%	-32.48%	+30.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	7.86%	-4.79%

Volatility

BKCG vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) is 4.96%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that BKCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKCG	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.96%	8.02%	-3.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.19%	24.07%	-12.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.76%	29.00%	-15.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.17%	30.27%	-12.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	35.96%	-17.79%

BKCG vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKCG vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

BKCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than OILK's 9.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKCG BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF	0.81%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	9.54%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCG and OILK in my portfolio?

BKCG and OILK have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKCG or OILK?

OILK has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to BKCG (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCG dropped -12.12% vs OILK's -83.76%.

Which ETF is better, BKCG or OILK?

On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 27.24% vs 10.62% for BKCG. On fees, BKCG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BKCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKCG or OILK?

Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 27.24% return vs 10.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCG or OILK?

BKCG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKCG or OILK?

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 9.54%, compared with 0.81% for BKCG.

What is the main difference between BKCG and OILK?

BKCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCG and 0.68% for OILK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.