PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKCG vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKCG vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCG achieves a 5.05% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.78% return.


BKCG

1D
0.99%
1M
2.17%
YTD
5.05%
6M
5.78%
1Y
14.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
0.48%
1M
4.64%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.52%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCG vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BKCG and ITOT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025

0.92

The correlation between BKCG and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKCG vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKCG
ITOT

Technology

37.8%
33.8%

Financial Services

19.5%
12.1%

Communication Services

12.8%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
10.1%

Industrials

9.2%
9.5%

Healthcare

6.2%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.7%

Basic Materials

-

2.1%

Energy

-

3.7%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

BKCG
37.8%
ITOT
33.8%

Financial Services

BKCG
19.5%
ITOT
12.1%

Communication Services

BKCG
12.8%
ITOT
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BKCG
11.6%
ITOT
10.1%

Industrials

BKCG
9.2%
ITOT
9.5%

Healthcare

BKCG
6.2%
ITOT
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

BKCG
2.9%
ITOT
4.7%

Basic Materials

BKCG

-

ITOT
2.1%

Energy

BKCG

-

ITOT
3.7%

Real Estate

BKCG

-

ITOT
2.4%

Utilities

BKCG

-

ITOT
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKCG vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCG
BKCG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BKCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BKCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCG vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKCGITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.43

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

3.25

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

14.92

-10.06

BKCG vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCG and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKCGITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

2.37

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.57

+0.57

Drawdowns

BKCG vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCG drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCG and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKCGITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-55.20%

+43.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-8.90%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-0.25%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-6.97%

+5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

1.94%

+1.03%

Volatility

BKCG vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.94%. This indicates that BKCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKCGITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

2.94%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.40%

9.14%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.21%

12.19%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.02%

17.35%

+0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

18.26%

-0.24%

BKCG vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKCG vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

BKCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than ITOT's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKCG
BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF
0.77%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.97%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, BKCG and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BKCG has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to ITOT (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCG dropped -12.12% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 1-year performance, ITOT leads with 28.81% vs 14.43% for BKCG. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 28.81% return vs 14.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BKCG.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.77% for BKCG.

BKCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BKCG and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKCG and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer