BJUN vs. YCS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BJUN (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - BJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BJUN returned 8.12%/yr vs 23.65%/yr for YCS. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BJUN charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

BJUN vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJUN achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 10.06% return.

BJUN

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -1.53%
• YTD: 2.89%
• 6M: 2.58%
• 1Y: 11.04%
• 3Y*: 13.41%
• 5Y*: 8.12%
• 10Y*: —

YCS

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 3.97%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 6M: 11.27%
• 1Y: 34.18%
• 3Y*: 18.53%
• 5Y*: 23.65%
• 10Y*: 13.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BJUN vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	2.89%	12.57%	16.31%	16.81%	-11.47%	10.73%	10.14%	10.91%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	10.06%	9.04%	35.41%	28.70%	29.09%	22.38%	-11.18%	3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BJUN and YCS is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019	0.05

The correlation between BJUN and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BJUN vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJUN

BJUN Risk / Return Rank: 62
BJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
BJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
BJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 77

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 73
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJUN vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BJUN	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	2.04	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	2.57	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.38	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	4.14	-1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.92	13.04	-0.12

BJUN vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJUN and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BJUN vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJUN drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJUN and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BJUN	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.71%	-49.56%	+26.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.36%	-8.30%	+3.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.69%	-23.05%	+10.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.69%	-27.32%	+10.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	0.00%	-2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-19.87%	+17.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	2.63%	-1.77%

Volatility

BJUN vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that BJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BJUN	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.26%	2.25%	+1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.57%	11.91%	-6.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.94%	16.93%	-9.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.96%	21.10%	-10.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.21%	18.82%	-5.61%

BJUN vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BJUN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BJUN vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

Neither BJUN nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BJUN and YCS in my portfolio?

BJUN and YCS have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BJUN or YCS?

BJUN has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BJUN dropped -22.71% vs YCS's -49.56%.

Which ETF is better, BJUN or YCS?

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.65% vs 8.12% for BJUN. On fees, BJUN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BJUN or YCS?

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.65% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BJUN or YCS?

BJUN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BJUN or YCS?

BJUN and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BJUN and YCS?

BJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. BJUN tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BJUN and 1.00% for YCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.