PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BJUN vs. XGRO.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BJUN and XGRO.TO is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

BJUN vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
7.07%
5.01%
BJUN
XGRO.TO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BJUN:

2.24

XGRO.TO:

2.41

Sortino Ratio

BJUN:

3.07

XGRO.TO:

3.38

Omega Ratio

BJUN:

1.48

XGRO.TO:

1.45

Calmar Ratio

BJUN:

2.97

XGRO.TO:

3.95

Martin Ratio

BJUN:

16.59

XGRO.TO:

16.31

Ulcer Index

BJUN:

0.96%

XGRO.TO:

1.24%

Daily Std Dev

BJUN:

7.16%

XGRO.TO:

8.39%

Max Drawdown

BJUN:

-22.70%

XGRO.TO:

-47.94%

Current Drawdown

BJUN:

-0.04%

XGRO.TO:

-0.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJUN achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly lower than XGRO.TO's 3.59% return.


BJUN

YTD

2.72%

1M

1.43%

6M

7.07%

1Y

15.86%

5Y*

8.23%

10Y*

N/A

XGRO.TO

YTD

3.59%

1M

1.78%

6M

9.47%

1Y

20.26%

5Y*

9.17%

10Y*

7.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BJUN vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BJUN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.


BJUN
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June
Expense ratio chart for BJUN: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for XGRO.TO: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BJUN vs. XGRO.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJUN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BJUN is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BJUN is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BJUN is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BJUN is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BJUN is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BJUN is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

XGRO.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XGRO.TO is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XGRO.TO is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XGRO.TO is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XGRO.TO is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XGRO.TO is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XGRO.TO is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BJUN vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BJUN, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.121.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for BJUN, currently valued at 2.91, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.911.80
The chart of Omega ratio for BJUN, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.461.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for BJUN, currently valued at 2.80, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.802.27
The chart of Martin ratio for BJUN, currently valued at 15.61, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0015.616.58
BJUN
XGRO.TO

The current BJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the XGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJUN and XGRO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.12
1.27
BJUN
XGRO.TO

Dividends

BJUN vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

BJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BJUN
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio
1.94%2.01%2.25%1.88%1.68%1.97%2.24%7.52%2.07%2.68%2.18%5.68%

Drawdowns

BJUN vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJUN drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, smaller than the maximum XGRO.TO drawdown of -47.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJUN and XGRO.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.04%
-0.02%
BJUN
XGRO.TO

Volatility

BJUN vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) is 1.44%, while iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that BJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.44%
2.69%
BJUN
XGRO.TO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab