BJUN vs. ZJUN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BJUN (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) and ZJUN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. BJUN is passively managed, while ZJUN is actively managed. Over the past year, BJUN returned 15.40% vs 6.47% for ZJUN. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

BJUN vs. ZJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJUN achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly higher than ZJUN's 2.42% return.

BJUN

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 6M: 5.85%
• 1Y: 15.40%
• 3Y*: 14.69%
• 5Y*: 8.90%
• 10Y*: —

ZJUN

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 6M: 3.00%
• 1Y: 6.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BJUN vs. ZJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	4.99%	9.92%
ZJUN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June	2.42%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BJUN and ZJUN is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

BJUN vs. ZJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJUN

BJUN Risk / Return Rank: 79
BJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJUN vs. ZJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BJUN	ZJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.50	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BJUN	ZJUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	3.55	-2.80

Drawdowns

BJUN vs. ZJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJUN drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, which is greater than ZJUN's maximum drawdown of -1.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJUN and ZJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BJUN	ZJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.71%	-1.08%	-21.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.36%	-1.08%	-3.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.85%	-0.08%	-2.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.77%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BJUN	ZJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.38%	1.83%	+4.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.88%	1.83%	+9.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.22%	1.83%	+11.39%

BJUN vs. ZJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BJUN and ZJUN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

BJUN vs. ZJUN - Dividend Comparison

Neither BJUN nor ZJUN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BJUN and ZJUN in my portfolio?

BJUN and ZJUN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BJUN or ZJUN?

On 1-year performance, BJUN leads with 15.40% vs 6.47% for ZJUN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BJUN or ZJUN?

Over the 1-year period, BJUN has performed better with a 15.40% return vs 6.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BJUN or ZJUN?

BJUN and ZJUN have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BJUN or ZJUN?

BJUN and ZJUN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.