PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BJUN vs. BOUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BJUN vs. BOUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJUN achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly lower than BOUT's 31.39% return.


BJUN

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.57%
YTD
4.45%
6M
5.26%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*

BOUT

1D
-0.01%
1M
5.85%
YTD
31.39%
6M
30.30%
1Y
35.27%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BJUN vs. BOUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BJUN
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June
4.45%12.57%16.31%16.81%-11.47%10.73%10.14%11.52%
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
31.39%-6.77%18.82%13.27%-22.60%22.69%50.56%4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BJUN and BOUT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.68

The correlation between BJUN and BOUT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BJUN vs. BOUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJUN
BJUN Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BOUT
BOUT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJUN vs. BOUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) and Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BJUNBOUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.30

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.01

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.84

9.00

+9.84

BJUN vs. BOUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the BOUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJUN and BOUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BJUNBOUTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.71

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.43

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.41

+0.33

Drawdowns

BJUN vs. BOUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJUN drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, smaller than the maximum BOUT drawdown of -36.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJUN and BOUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BJUNBOUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.71%

-36.75%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-11.76%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-25.31%

+12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.69%

-28.28%

+11.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.01%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-12.29%

+9.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

3.93%

-3.16%

Volatility

BJUN vs. BOUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) is 0.63%, while Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that BJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BJUNBOUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

5.96%

-5.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.67%

16.05%

-11.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.40%

20.79%

-14.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.88%

19.48%

-8.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

22.93%

-9.72%

BJUN vs. BOUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BJUN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BOUT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

BJUN vs. BOUT - Dividend Comparison

BJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BJUN
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
0.26%0.34%0.60%1.32%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BJUN and BOUT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOUT has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to BJUN (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BJUN dropped -22.71% vs BOUT's -36.75%.

On 5-year performance, BJUN leads with 8.67% vs 8.25% for BOUT. On fees, BJUN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BJUN has performed better with a 8.67% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BJUN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.

BOUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for BJUN.

BJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BOUT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. BJUN tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while BOUT tracks IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BJUN and 0.80% for BOUT.

BJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BJUN and BOUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer