BJUL vs. POCT
BJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BJUL tracks the S&P 500 while POCT tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BJUL returned 11.49%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for POCT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
BJUL vs. POCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BJUL achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's 5.56% return.
BJUL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 6.34%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- 18.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- —
POCT
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 14.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
BJUL vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July | 6.34% | 13.93% | 18.41% | 21.73% | -7.38% | 10.77% | 9.05% | 17.81% | -9.03% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 5.56% | 11.00% | 9.54% | 20.12% | -1.26% | 9.46% | 10.40% | 12.80% | -7.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BJUL and POCT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between BJUL and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
BJUL vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BJUL
POCT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BJUL
POCT
Financial Services
BJUL
POCT
Communication Services
BJUL
POCT
Consumer Cyclical
BJUL
POCT
Healthcare
BJUL
POCT
Industrials
BJUL
POCT
Consumer Defensive
BJUL
POCT
Energy
BJUL
POCT
Utilities
BJUL
POCT
Real Estate
BJUL
POCT
Basic Materials
BJUL
POCT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BJUL vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank
BJUL
POCT
BJUL vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BJUL | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.48 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 3.35 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.31 | 17.20 | +1.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BJUL | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 2.40 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 1.25 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.88 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
BJUL vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BJUL drawdown since its inception was -24.03%, which is greater than POCT's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJUL and POCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BJUL | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.03% | -18.80% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.40% | -4.40% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.06% | -10.22% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.06% | -10.22% | -3.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -1.50% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 0.86% | +0.18% |
Volatility
BJUL vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) is 0.67%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a volatility of 0.90%. This indicates that BJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BJUL | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 0.90% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.50% | 4.77% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.58% | 6.15% | +1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.61% | 7.94% | +3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 10.22% | +3.42% |
BJUL vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BJUL and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
BJUL vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither BJUL nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BJUL and POCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
POCT has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to BJUL (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BJUL dropped -24.03% vs POCT's -18.80%.
On 5-year performance, BJUL leads with 11.49% vs 9.87% for POCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BJUL has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BJUL and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
BJUL and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BJUL tracks S&P 500, while POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index.
BJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BJUL and POCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer