PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BJUL vs. POCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BJUL vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJUL achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's 5.56% return.


BJUL

1D
0.05%
1M
1.80%
YTD
6.34%
6M
6.98%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
16.82%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*

POCT

1D
0.22%
1M
1.85%
YTD
5.56%
6M
6.01%
1Y
14.67%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BJUL vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July
6.34%13.93%18.41%21.73%-7.38%10.77%9.05%17.81%-9.03%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
5.56%11.00%9.54%20.12%-1.26%9.46%10.40%12.80%-7.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BJUL and POCT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018

0.87

The correlation between BJUL and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BJUL vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BJUL
POCT

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

BJUL
36.2%
POCT
36.2%

Financial Services

BJUL
11.9%
POCT
11.9%

Communication Services

BJUL
10.9%
POCT
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BJUL
10.1%
POCT
10.1%

Healthcare

BJUL
8.4%
POCT
8.4%

Industrials

BJUL
8.1%
POCT
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

BJUL
4.9%
POCT
4.9%

Energy

BJUL
3.5%
POCT
3.5%

Utilities

BJUL
2.3%
POCT
2.3%

Real Estate

BJUL
1.9%
POCT
1.9%

Basic Materials

BJUL
1.8%
POCT
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BJUL vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJUL
BJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJUL vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BJULPOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.48

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

3.35

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.31

17.20

+1.11

BJUL vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJUL and POCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BJULPOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.40

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

1.25

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.88

-0.14

Drawdowns

BJUL vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJUL drawdown since its inception was -24.03%, which is greater than POCT's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJUL and POCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BJULPOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.03%

-18.80%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.40%

-4.40%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-10.22%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.06%

-10.22%

-3.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-1.50%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.86%

+0.18%

Volatility

BJUL vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) is 0.67%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a volatility of 0.90%. This indicates that BJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BJULPOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

0.90%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.50%

4.77%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.58%

6.15%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.61%

7.94%

+3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.64%

10.22%

+3.42%

BJUL vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BJUL and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

BJUL vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BJUL nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BJUL and POCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

POCT has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to BJUL (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BJUL dropped -24.03% vs POCT's -18.80%.

On 5-year performance, BJUL leads with 11.49% vs 9.87% for POCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BJUL has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BJUL and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

BJUL and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BJUL tracks S&P 500, while POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index.

BJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BJUL and POCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer