PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BJUL vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BJUL vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJUL achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.09% return.


BJUL

1D
0.05%
1M
1.80%
YTD
6.34%
6M
6.98%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
16.82%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*

OILK

1D
-1.91%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
61.09%
6M
56.40%
1Y
56.95%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
17.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BJUL vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July
6.34%13.93%18.41%21.73%-7.38%10.77%9.05%17.81%-8.49%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
61.09%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-33.92%

Correlation

The correlation between BJUL and OILK is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018

0.17

The correlation between BJUL and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BJUL vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BJUL
OILK

Technology

36.2%

-

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
100.0%

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

BJUL
36.2%
OILK

-

Financial Services

BJUL
11.9%
OILK

-

Communication Services

BJUL
10.9%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

BJUL
10.1%
OILK
100.0%

Healthcare

BJUL
8.4%
OILK

-

Industrials

BJUL
8.1%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

BJUL
4.9%
OILK

-

Energy

BJUL
3.5%
OILK

-

Utilities

BJUL
2.3%
OILK

-

Real Estate

BJUL
1.9%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

BJUL
1.8%
OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BJUL vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJUL
BJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJUL vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BJULOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.33

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

3.30

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.31

6.67

+11.64

BJUL vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJUL and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BJULOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

1.99

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.58

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.11

+0.63

Drawdowns

BJUL vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJUL drawdown since its inception was -24.03%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJUL and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BJULOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.03%

-83.76%

+59.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.40%

-17.35%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.06%

-23.42%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.06%

-34.69%

+20.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.49%

+5.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-32.60%

+30.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

8.57%

-7.53%

Volatility

BJUL vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) is 0.67%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.52%. This indicates that BJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BJULOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

10.52%

-9.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.50%

23.32%

-17.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.58%

28.82%

-21.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.61%

30.13%

-18.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.64%

35.97%

-22.33%

BJUL vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

BJUL vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

BJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.34%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


BJUL and OILK have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to BJUL (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BJUL dropped -24.03% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.28% vs 11.49% for BJUL. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 11.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BJUL.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 0.00% for BJUL.

BJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while OILK is Oil & Gas. BJUL tracks S&P 500, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BJUL and 0.68% for OILK.

BJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BJUL and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer