BJAN vs. MDLZ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

BJAN (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January) is Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, BJAN returned 10.40%/yr vs 2.36%/yr for MDLZ. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BJAN vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJAN achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly lower than MDLZ's 18.03% return.

BJAN

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 6.13%
• 6M: 7.42%
• 1Y: 19.73%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: —

MDLZ

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 18.03%
• 6M: 18.65%
• 1Y: -2.75%
• 3Y*: -1.98%
• 5Y*: 2.36%
• 10Y*: 6.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BJAN vs. MDLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January	6.13%	14.81%	17.36%	23.66%	-11.40%	13.86%	12.54%	22.27%
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc.	18.03%	-7.03%	-15.30%	11.17%	2.92%	15.87%	8.58%	40.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BJAN and MDLZ is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2019	0.34

The correlation between BJAN and MDLZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BJAN vs. MDLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJAN

BJAN Risk / Return Rank: 81
BJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 86
BJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 84

MDLZ

MDLZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
MDLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
MDLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MDLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 29
MDLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
MDLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJAN vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BJAN	MDLZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	-0.20	+2.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	-0.13	+3.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	0.98	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	-0.17	+3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.94	-0.30	+15.24

BJAN vs. MDLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the MDLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJAN and MDLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BJAN vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJAN drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, smaller than the maximum MDLZ drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJAN and MDLZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BJAN	MDLZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.86%	-42.52%	+15.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.27%	-25.93%	+19.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.81%	-29.00%	+15.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.38%	-29.14%	+11.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-12.59%	+11.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.90%	-11.03%	+8.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	14.70%	-13.44%

Volatility

BJAN vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) is 2.23%, while Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that BJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BJAN	MDLZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.23%	5.46%	-3.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.34%	16.28%	-9.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.87%	22.26%	-14.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.99%	19.52%	-7.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.06%	21.03%	-6.97%

Dividends

BJAN vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison

BJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc.	3.13%	3.60%	3.00%	2.24%	2.21%	2.01%	2.05%	1.98%	2.40%	1.92%	1.62%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BJAN and MDLZ in my portfolio?

BJAN and MDLZ have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BJAN or MDLZ?

MDLZ has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to BJAN (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BJAN dropped -26.86% vs MDLZ's -42.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.