BIZD vs. BDCZ
BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) and BDCZ (ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN) are both Financials Equities funds - BIZD tracks the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index while BDCZ tracks the BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BIZD returned 7.77%/yr vs 6.23%/yr for BDCZ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BIZD charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BDCZ.
Performance
BIZD vs. BDCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -8.99% return, which is significantly lower than BDCZ's -7.98% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has outperformed BDCZ with an annualized return of 7.77%, while BDCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.23% annualized return.
BIZD
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -6.62%
- YTD
- -8.99%
- 6M
- -10.20%
- 1Y
- -12.94%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.77%
BDCZ
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -7.44%
- YTD
- -7.98%
- 6M
- -8.99%
- 1Y
- -10.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.23%
BIZD vs. BDCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -8.99% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | -7.12% | 30.87% | -6.88% | 0.36% |
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN | -7.98% | -3.72% | 12.22% | 25.31% | -9.12% | 33.97% | -10.95% | 26.00% | -7.64% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIZD and BDCZ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.79 |
The correlation between BIZD and BDCZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIZD vs. BDCZ — Risk / Return Rank
BIZD
BDCZ
BIZD vs. BDCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIZD | BDCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | -0.51 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | -0.59 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.93 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.52 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | -0.95 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIZD | BDCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | -0.51 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.19 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.29 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.27 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
BIZD vs. BDCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, roughly equal to the maximum BDCZ drawdown of -55.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and BDCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIZD | BDCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.44% | -55.63% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.22% | -19.95% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -20.77% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | -23.12% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.44% | -55.63% | +0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.27% | -17.27% | -2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -7.86% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.63% | 10.94% | +1.69% |
Volatility
BIZD vs. BDCZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) is 4.79%, while ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that BIZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIZD | BDCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 8.37% | -3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.77% | 17.17% | -2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.11% | 20.42% | -2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 17.80% | -0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 21.73% | +0.01% |
BIZD vs. BDCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIZD has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than BDCZ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIZD vs. BDCZ - Dividend Comparison
BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.87%, more than BDCZ's 11.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN | 11.28% | 10.65% | 9.26% | 9.13% | 9.39% | 7.49% | 10.01% | 8.40% | 9.66% | 8.74% | 7.98% | 0.00% |
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 13.87% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIZD and BDCZ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDCZ has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to BIZD (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIZD dropped -55.44% vs BDCZ's -55.63%.
On 10-year performance, BIZD leads with 7.77% vs 6.23% for BDCZ. On fees, BIZD is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BIZD has performed better with a 7.77% return vs 6.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIZD is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BDCZ.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.87%, compared with 11.28% for BDCZ.
BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while BDCZ tracks BDCZ-US - MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BIZD and 0.85% for BDCZ.
BDCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIZD and BDCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer