BIVIX vs. NLSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX).
BIVIX is an actively managed fund by Invenomic. It was launched on Jun 19, 2017. NLSIX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Dec 28, 2011.
Performance
BIVIX vs. NLSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIVIX vs. NLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | 6.05% | 4.63% | -8.81% | 16.80% | 50.01% | 63.81% | 11.46% | 11.59% | 3.68% | 8.93% |
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund | -3.63% | 7.20% | 7.47% | 13.10% | -6.85% | 9.01% | 15.27% | 17.11% | -6.92% | 5.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIVIX achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly higher than NLSIX's -3.63% return.
BIVIX
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 6M
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 1.96%
- 5Y*
- 17.01%
- 10Y*
- —
NLSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- -3.63%
- 6M
- -3.20%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIVIX vs. NLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIVIX has a 3.17% expense ratio, which is higher than NLSIX's 1.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIVIX vs. NLSIX — Risk / Return Rank
BIVIX
NLSIX
BIVIX vs. NLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIVIX | NLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | 0.57 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.67 | 0.87 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.12 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 0.63 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.99 | 2.31 | -1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIVIX | NLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 0.57 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 0.72 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.91 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIVIX and NLSIX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
BIVIX vs. NLSIX - Dividend Comparison
BIVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than NLSIX's 0.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVIX Invenomic Fund Institutional Class | 2.07% | 2.20% | 3.95% | 20.15% | 27.91% | 16.08% | 3.15% | 3.19% | 4.79% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.97% | 7.01% | 1.13% | 2.15% | 2.39% | 5.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
BIVIX vs. NLSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIVIX drawdown since its inception was -18.32%, which is greater than NLSIX's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIVIX and NLSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIVIX | NLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.32% | -14.75% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -4.39% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.23% | -10.79% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -4.39% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -2.03% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.10% | 1.19% | +4.91% |
Volatility
BIVIX vs. NLSIX - Volatility Comparison
Invenomic Fund Institutional Class (BIVIX) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) at 1.89%. This indicates that BIVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIVIX | NLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 1.89% | +5.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.63% | 3.40% | +13.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.71% | 6.34% | +14.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 6.63% | +9.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 7.29% | +9.31% |