BIV vs. CNQ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) is Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index, while CNQ (Canadian Natural Resources Limited) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BIV returned 1.83%/yr vs 18.22%/yr for CNQ. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

BIV vs. CNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIV achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ's 37.99% return. Over the past 10 years, BIV has underperformed CNQ with an annualized return of 1.83%, while CNQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.22% annualized return.

BIV

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.94%
• YTD: -0.67%
• 6M: -0.33%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 4.27%
• 5Y*: 0.08%
• 10Y*: 1.83%

CNQ

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: 3.95%
• YTD: 37.99%
• 6M: 38.89%
• 1Y: 53.83%
• 3Y*: 23.71%
• 5Y*: 26.79%
• 10Y*: 18.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIV vs. CNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF	-0.67%	8.52%	1.57%	6.07%	-13.21%	-2.40%	9.67%	10.34%	-0.19%	3.65%
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited	37.99%	15.58%	-1.31%	23.72%	42.82%	83.55%	-19.06%	39.72%	-29.92%	15.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BIV and CNQ is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007	-0.17

The correlation between BIV and CNQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to -0.06 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BIV vs. CNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIV

BIV Risk / Return Rank: 34
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 32

CNQ

CNQ Risk / Return Rank: 85
CNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIV vs. CNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIV	CNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	1.87	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.34	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.30	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	3.82	-2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	8.73	-4.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIV vs. CNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the CNQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIV and CNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIV	CNQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	1.87	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	0.82	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	0.45	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.41	+0.23

Drawdowns

BIV vs. CNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIV drawdown since its inception was -18.95%, smaller than the maximum CNQ drawdown of -80.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIV and CNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIV	CNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.95%	-80.75%	+61.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.18%	-14.16%	+10.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.07%	-35.85%	+29.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.74%	-35.85%	+17.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.95%	-77.84%	+58.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.46%	-7.60%	+5.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.39%	-23.52%	+20.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	6.18%	-5.11%

Volatility

BIV vs. CNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) is 1.35%, while Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) has a volatility of 8.80%. This indicates that BIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIV	CNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	8.80%	-7.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.93%	23.90%	-20.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.00%	28.96%	-24.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.40%	32.84%	-26.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.51%	40.26%	-34.75%

Dividends

BIV vs. CNQ - Dividend Comparison

BIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than CNQ's 3.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF	4.24%	4.01%	3.79%	3.09%	2.41%	3.42%	2.95%	2.75%	2.88%	2.69%	3.01%	3.02%
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited	3.76%	5.01%	5.02%	4.17%	6.31%	3.78%	5.26%	3.49%	4.56%	3.08%	2.94%	4.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIV and CNQ in my portfolio?

BIV and CNQ have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIV or CNQ?

CNQ has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to BIV (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIV dropped -18.95% vs CNQ's -80.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.